Why Rand Paul is never, ever going to be President

Because who in their right mind is going to want someone, whose Father says stuff like this, to be President of the United States of America? Not me.

Audio:

The Story:

 

Former Republican Rep. Ron Paul, the father of potential presidential candidate Rand Paul and a former presidential candidate himself, said the Congressional Black Caucus does not support war because they want that money for food stamps.

“I was always annoyed with it in Congress because we had an anti-war unofficial group, a few libertarian Republicans and generally the Black Caucus and others did not—they are really against war because they want all of that money to go to food stamps for people here,” Ron Paul told Lew Rockwell in early February during a discussion on sanctions.

via Ron Paul: Black Caucus Only Against War Because They Want That Money For Food Stamps – BuzzFeed News.

As much as I dislike the neocons of the Kristol and Podhoretz stripe; they have a point about Ron Paul and to a lesser degree Rand Paul. This above is just straight up bigotry. I mean, the N-Word was not used, okay? I see that. However, Ron Paul basically said that all the blacks ever want is hand outs from the Government.

Sorry, but, that is nothing more than blind bigotry.

I mean, between this and Rudy; we’re screwed for 2016. 😡

2 thoughts on “Why Rand Paul is never, ever going to be President

  1. Here are a few issues with your comments:

    1. Quote:

    It’s pretty well known that’s the reason blacks overwhelmingly support the left.

    Well, it might just be because of bigoted jackwads like you! I mean, every other word out of so-called conservatives, like you, is “Black people are this, black people are that!” That does tend to piss black people off. I’m just saying… 🙄

    2. Quote:

    But then again you link to Jack Chick’s trash (and you accuse people of bigotry)

    Stop right there! Anyone that calls Jack Chick’s truth telling tracts “trash” has no business discussing bigotry with me. I am, without apology, a Fundamentalist Baptist Christian; and if my beliefs bother you, then good, I’ve done my job. Hope you are saved and accept Christ as your personal saviour.

    3. Quote:

    and a whole section of “anti-jihad” sites instead of ones against Zionism, a major cause of “jihad” (also an inaccurate, Fox News-esque use of that term),

    Anyone that thinks that Islamic Jihad is a creation of Fox News, is terminally stupid and out of touch with reality. By the way, I hope an ISIS terrorist kills you and your family. 😡 Because God knows, you truly deserve it; you looney liberal twit! By the way, radical shmadical, the problem is ISLAM! Period, end of discussion.

    4.

    I really hate to see how loosely people use the term “paleoconservative” these days

    If hating Israel, Jews, and believing that America should not defend itself from the ISLAMIC menace; makes me not a Paleoconservative in your eyes; so be it. I do not support Wilsonian foreign policy. But, I am not a bigot. I serve Christ and I know that one day that Christ will establish HIS kingdom in Jerusalem one day. There will also be 144 thousand Jews saved in the kingdom to come.

    5. Quote:

    so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.

    Neither should I. Bigots are quite common in Paleoconservative circles. I am not one of them. I have issues with those who stir the pot, when it comes to racial matters; that we’ll have to deal with, til Jesus comes and that stuff is a result of a lack of Christ in their hearts.

    Personally, I think that you are just trolling here, looking for a fight. Maybe because someone linked here. Good luck with that; because I will not be answering anymore of your insults. and if you keep it up, you’ll be banned from viewing this blog.

    …and have a nice day!

    -Patrick
    Owner
    American Patriot

  2. It’s pretty well known that’s the reason blacks overwhelmingly support the left. What alternative do you believe? But then again you link to Jack Chick’s trash (and you accuse people of bigotry) and a whole section of “anti-jihad” sites instead of ones against Zionism, a major cause of “jihad” (also an inaccurate, Fox News-esque use of that term), so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. I really hate to see how loosely people use the term “paleoconservative” these days.

Comments are closed.