A very good point on conservative blogs

I saw this and I have to say, I agree with it.

Doomberg over at HotGas.net writes:

March 11 was a really bad day, for a lot of rea­sons, but the main one was hav­ing to watch the GOP cheer and gloat as their own frontrunner’s rally was attacked by a vio­lent, dan­ger­ous mob, and then watch as many peo­ple such as Ted Cruz, and blogs we once liked and trusted —  I don’t think I need to name names, here — encour­age or make disin­gen­u­ous excuses for this vio­lence. The prox­i­mate excuse we’re hear­ing from GOP hacks and shills is that a Bre­it­bart reporter was “vio­lently assaulted” at a Trump rally (despite the story now qui­etly chang­ing to “may have had her arm grabbed”) and that since this is clear evi­dence of “fas­cism,” that vio­lence against Trump sup­port­ers is now accept­able and even moral. The argu­ment we’re hear­ing from the MSM is that all this seething “fas­cism” from Trump erupted into sort of a spon­ta­neous mob event.

If this argu­ment sounds like Hillary blam­ing a Youtube video for Beng­hazi rather than the orga­nized attack it actu­ally was, that’s because it is. And now we’re hear­ing “con­ser­v­a­tive” media make it along with the MSM.

I’ve been read­ing the blo­gos­phere since shortly after the events of Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001. At that time, the blogs were started because of the cor­rect per­cep­tion the MSM was hope­lessly biased and spoke with one voice on major issues — they were seen by many as edi­to­ri­al­iz­ing and blam­ing Amer­ica for the events of Sep­tem­ber 11. Their read­ers were fed up with the media spin, and that cre­ated a ripe envi­ron­ment for the blogs to grow and thrive as they pro­vided an alter­na­tive point of view and helped their read­ers see through the MSM bias.

Unfor­tu­nately, those days are long gone. Many of the orig­i­nal blog­gers have got­ten “big” and now see them­selves as reporters or pun­dits in their own right, and many of their friends are now in the same social cir­cles the MSM reporters run in. Many are now able to inter­view impor­tant pub­lic fig­ures. Guys like Ed Mor­ris­sey, for exam­ple, now have their own show and pub­lish books. Many of the old blog­gers who have been doing this for years have now either become part of the machine they fought or des­per­ately want to join into its ranks too, so they can enjoy the social sta­tus and the money. This has, in many cases, led them to con­duct mass purges of their own read­ers to please their left­ist friends on Twit­ter.

A very and quite astute point; which is one that I have been making on this blog for a very long time. It seems to this writer that the right, especially among the bloggers, has gotten as nasty, if not worse, towards Obama and the left; than the left was against Bush and the right. It also points to a trend that has taken place in the blogosphere; left and right — and that is the corporatizing of the blogosphere. It started around the end of 2006 for the left and started after the election of Obama on the right. Lots of blogs, that had some decent readership, began to get, basically, bought out. In fact, I was offered some good money to get corporate sponsorship. I politely turned them down. I can’t be bought. Never will be either! I am an independent blogger with conservative leanings; not a shill.

Doomberg is making a point about the protests in Chicago, and the botched Trump rally there. He’s right about all the he said up there. I do believe that Trump could have planned that one a bit better. Maybe held it somewhere else, instead of in Chicago proper; maybe in the ‘Burbs? Either way, armchair quarterbacking, at this point, is silly.

The point is well made.