Talk about pee-in-the-pants funny…. đ
(H/T InstaPundit)
Wow, just WowâŚ.
The Video:
I do not link to these guys often; because I happen to think that Newsbusters is a partisan operation. However, when they are right, they are right. Anyhow, Noel Sheppard over at NewsBusters makes the following observation:
Imagine for a moment the outrage if a conservative commentator said even jokingly to Obama supporters, “White people know who you are and they will come after you.” That would be the end of that person’s career. Period. No questions asked. Done! But Maher who’s adored by the Obama-loving media can say this with total impunity. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: HBO should be ashamed to have this disgusting man as one of its on air personalities. Period. End of story.
I agree. Because of the liberal media bias in America; and because Bill Maher happens to be of the correct protected minority ethnic bloodline, on his mother’s side — he can get away with sort of thing. Just my opinion.
However, Sheppard is correct, if a Conservative had said the same thing, but with black and white switched out, he would be called a Nazi, A racist and a bunch of other stuff and his career would be over. Just another example of the perverted nonsense that plaques this Country.
Vote different come November 6’th.
When I saw the title, I thought it was from a Conservative group; it wasn’t. It was from these guys:
The title?
“Turn off MSNBC”
The e-mail:
|
|
|
Wow! When the AFL-CIO is telling people to turn off MSNBC, you KNOW something is wrong in hamburger helper land. If you catch my drift. I am thinking that the liberals are already conceding defeat.
I have a really good feeling about this election, I really do. I do believe that the silent majority is going to vote and things are going to change once again; for the good.
If you will allow me to just blather on for a second here; the Democrats have no one to blame, but themselves. They did it to themselves. They chose skin color over real experience. They chose to follow in the footsteps of Carter, instead of Roosevelt. They chose to pursue far-leftist ideology, over pragmatism. They chose to run to the far-left, instead of a moderate Democratic agenda. They chose to attempt to alter the Nation’s healthcare system, instead of trying to fix the economy. They did it backwards; and now, they are paying the price for it.
I said this long ago, that the Democrats would pay and pay dearly for it; and now it is coming to pass. There are consequences to overreach, just like Republican-controlled Congress suffered under Dennis Hastert in 2007. Just like Democrats suffered in 2009, when they lost big. You cannot overreach in politics, when you do, you suffer for it. George H.W. Bush did it, Clinton did it, but managed to stay in office. George W. Bush did it, and John McCain lost.
I am pretty much thinking here, that if Romney wins this election, that the Democrats are going to suffer a huge setback and that the party could very well fall apart. I hope not; I hope that more saner, moderate voices will take that party back and move it more towards the center. I believe in divided Government, and I believe that the Democrat’s future is in moderation, not in extremist policies.
However, because I am a realist, and I know how progressivism works; I happen to know that, once the genie is out of the bottle, there is no putting it back. Let’s just say that the big black genie was let out of the bottle in 2008 and the Democrats are going to have a heck of a time getting him back in that bottle.
Hope requires Faith, and now, I just do not have much Faith in the Democratic Party of today.
You remember olâ Alan Dershowitz? The man that went after Media Matters? Turns out heâs nothing more than youâre a-typical self-hating liberal Jew.
Via Tablet Magazine who observes:
If President Barack Obama is so bad on Israel, why are some of his most prominent Jewish critics planning on voting for him anyway? The list of these critics is long, but it includes former New York City Mayor Ed Koch, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, and media tycoon Haim Saban. All three spent Obamaâs first term laying into the president on his Israel policy as if it were their litmus testâand all three are now publicly supporting his re-election.
Powerhouse lawyer Alan Dershowitz criticized Obama in the Wall Street Journal for not sending a tough enough message to the Iranian regime, and he even wondered openly if the president might be remembered as âthe Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century.â
However, it seems that Dershowitz was sufficiently impressed by Obamaâs seriousness regarding Iran when, in a personal meeting in the Oval Office, the president assured him, âI donât bluff.â Now the professor is stumping for the president in Florida, and yesterday he officially endorsed him in the Jerusalem Post, writing that âthe case for the reelection of Barack Obama is a compelling one, based not only on his past record but on the specific policies he has proposed for the next four years.â
Ed Koch famously sent âa message to President Obama that he cannot throw Israel under the bus with impunityâ last year in the New York Times. He ripped the president in 2010 when the administration made a big issue out of continued Israeli construction in East Jerusalem. âWhat they did is they wanted to make Israel into a pariah,â he said of the White House. âItâs outrageous in my judgment.â Koch noted that he campaigned for Obama in 2008, and pushed Jews to vote for him, arguing he would be just as solid in his support for Israel as the Republican candidate, John McCain. âI donât think itâs true anymore,â said Koch.
But now the mayor is back in Obamaâs fold, if somewhat reluctantly, âI believe that he is going to win whether I vote for him or not,â Koch told a radio interviewer in September. âSo, wouldnât it be better that he wins changing his positions?â
In 2011, Haim Saban was angry with the administration for airing its grievances with Israel in publicâand he went on CNBC to say so. Now that the election is around the corner, the Israeli-American billionaire is singing a different tune. The presidentâs âsupport for Israelâs security and well-being has been rock solid,â Saban wrote in a heavily circulated New York Times op-ed last month. âWhatâs the case against Mr. Obama? That he hasnât visited Israel since he was a candidate in 2008? Perhaps these critics have forgotten that George W. Bush, that great friend of Israel, didnât visit Jerusalem until his seventh year in office,â Saban added. Somehow Saban seems to have forgotten that he is one of those critics.
So, what gives? Obamaâs record on Israel, as Koch, Dershowitz, and Saban have all helpfully pointed out, is not good. The presidentâs strained relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is unlikely to improve in a second term when Israeli-American relations will be more crucial than ever with Iran on the verge of nuclear breakout. Obama says he has Israelâs back and reminds us regularly of the trip he took to Sderot as a candidate. But who can forget that he started his first term telling a group of Jewish leaders he invited to the White House that it was important to put daylight between the United States and Israel?
Maybe former Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz was right when he wrote after the 2008 election that no matter how dire the situation for Israel, Jews simply cannot bring themselves to vote for Republicans. As much as American Jews care, or claim to care, about the Jewish state, they are not one-issue voters. They care just as much, if not more, about issues that other liberal voters care about, like abortion and gay rights. (Podhoretz had hoped for âbuyerâs remorseâ among Jews who supported Obama in 2008, but no such luck. The latest Gallup poll shows that Jewish voters are going for Obama over Mitt Romney 70 to 25.)
Yes, I do highly recommend that you go read the rest of that; as it is a very good piece and I really hated to have to quote so much of it; but I wanted everyone to get the gist of what is happening here.
Now, I realize that not all Jews are Zionist; yes, I understand that is a collectivist mentality and I am not much into group thought at all. However, my argument that supporting the Democratic Party would be like a Jew supporting Hitler; is one of an moral argument than anything else. It just to me, as a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Christian American; an outsider —- does not make any kind of sense at all. Maybe I am just a weirdo or something. Because you would think that seeing all of the stuff, and I do mean ALL OF THE STUFF that the Jews have went through in the last 70 years; that every single cotton-picking Jew in America would want to be on the side that support the Jews one hundred percent and Israel one hundred percent.
This is not to say that Democrats have always been this hostile towards Israel and the Jews. Look what Roosevelt and Truman did during World War 2. The problem is, that is not the same party anymore. In fact, the Democrat Party since 2007, has gotten downright nasty towards Israel, Jews and the sort of stuff. I know, I was over there once.
Something else too, earlier, I wrote a posting ripping William Kristol a new butthole. I also tossed Podhoretz in there, the lovely screwball. Anyhow, as much as I find their foreign policy a bit off-putting. I give them this bit of credit; at least they actually support their own homeland. Which is more than I say about this onion headed idiot Dershowitz! I mean, why doesnât he just say, âYes, Palestine, Please, kill me, rape my children and steal my money and get it over with.â It is a bit of a sick way of making the point; but I am sure most of you get what I mean.
I guess the further I go here; the less I really understand the Jewish culture; they are a diverse group; and in the case of Israel and her defense — that is a great American tragedy.
Oh, no he did not! đĄ
Oh, yes he did! đŻ
The Video (via Human Events, H/T to Ed Driscoll)
Quote via Human Events:
In an interview with CNN host Piers Morgan last week, Media mogul and CNN founder Ted Turner said the fact that there have been more suicides than combat deaths in the Army this year is not âshocking,â but âgood.â
Highlighted first by Breitbart.com, the Oct. 19 interview has Turner speculating that âitâs time to put war and conflict behind us and move on,â and the rising rate of self-inflicted troop deaths is good because it brings attention to that view.
Hereâs the exchange:
TURNER: Itâs time to put war and conflict behind us and move on, and start acting like civilized, educated human beings.
MORGAN: You made the point to me in the break there, more American servicemen have â
TURNER: â are dying now from suicide over there than are dying in combat.
MORGAN: Thatâs shocking, isnât it?
TURNER: Well, what â no, I think itâs â I think itâs good, because itâs so clear that weâre programmed and weâre born to love and help each other, not to kill each other, to destroy each other. Thatâs an aberration. Thatâs left over from hundreds of years ago. Itâs time for to us start acting enlightened.
Yessir! That right there is your modern-day liberal left in this Country. It is good the United States Military staff are killing themselves. It will help us all become more enlightened. Wow…..Just wow…. This is why I quit voting for them. đĄ
Rightfully, Ed Driscoll rightfully points out:
- âEason Jordan, CNN: US Troops Target Journalists in Iraqâ â the Davos Forum Blog, January 28th, 2005. Jordon would resign from his post as CNNâs chief news executive a couple of weeks later.
I wonder what will happen to Ted Turner? Nothing, most likely, but just the same; is this what you want to vote for come November?
This is not a not a big shocker, really.
Via CBS:
With 12 days to go before the presidential election, Powell publicly endorsed President Obama for re-election on “CBS This Morning” Thursday
“I voted for him in 2008 and I plan to stick with him in 2012 and I’ll be voting for he and for Vice President Joe Biden next month.”
Powell explained his choice to Charlie Rose and Norah O’Donnell:
When he took over, the country was in very very difficult straits. We were in the one of the worst recessions we had seen in recent times, close to a depression. The fiscal system was collapsing. Wall Street was in chaos, we had 800,000 jobs lost in that first month of the Obama administration and unemployment peaked a few months later at 10 percent. So we were in real trouble. The auto industry was collapsing, the housing was start[ing] to collapse and we were in very difficult straits. And I saw over the next several years, stabilization come back in the financial community, housing is now starting to pick up after four years, it’s starting to pick up. Consumer confidence is rising.”
Summarizing the past four years under Obama, Powell said “Generally we’ve come out of the dive and we’re starting to gain altitude.” He acknowledged that problems remain, saying “The unemployment rate is too high, people are still hurting in housing but I see that we’re starting to rise up.”
Turning to foreign policy, Powell said he saw “the president get us of one war, start to get us out of a second war and did not get us into any new wars. And finally I think that the actions he has taken with respect to protecting us from terrorism have been very very solid. And so, I think we ought to keep on the track that we are on.”
He goes on in this story to bash Mitt Romney and his policies. What gets me, is that the man just cannot be honest and say that he support President Obama because he is black. What is so hard about just saying, âHeâs a black brother and I support him.â? It just does not make sense.
Of course, if a White man like me says this; then the left likes to yell, RAAAAACIST! Which is what they are truly good for anymore. Just ask Chris Matthews.
On CBN Newswatch, Oct. 24:
I don’t give two flips what your politics is; this right here, is not cool at all.
Early Friday morning, thugs presumably supporting President Obama beat up the son of Wisconsin State Senator Neal Kedzie outside of his apartment in Whitewater. Kedzie caught the two men removing a Romney sign outside of his apartment around two o’clock in the morning. After telling them to put the signs back, one of the thugs attacked Kedzie and then put him in a choke hold and continued to beat his head.Mark Belling spoke to the Senatorâs son Sean on the radio earlier today. Sean Kedzie told Belling he was rushed to the hospital by ambulance with possible skull and eye socket fractures.
**Update: I spoke to Sean Kedzie this evening; he told me is doing well under the circumstances. He said, unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be much of an effort to notify people that this incident has occurred, and the two men that beat him up have still not been caught.
Kedzie also said, “the next night another sign was removed from his yard supporting Tommy Thompson for Senate and the night after that an ‘I stand with Walker’ sign was stolen.”
Kedzie told me he is concerned if the thugs that beat him are not caught, other people may be hurt for simply having signs in their yard supporting particular candidates. When I asked if there is anything that people can do to help, he replied, “just stand up for their rights and what they believe in.”
via Wisconsin Senator’s Son Beaten to Pulp by Anti-Romney Thugs.
This stuff is not even funny at all. This is the stuff that used to happen to the unions back in the day, at the Battle of the overpass. It is too bad that Democrats have forgotten about all of that. I remember it, because my Dad is a retired GM worker and I know the history of the labor movement. Here is hoping that they catch these punks and put them away for a good long while.
Others: The Gateway Pundit, The Lonely Conservative, Weasel Zippers, LifeNews.com and American Power
This comes via Darlene Click on Facebook:
This ad was produced by Americanâs Future Fund
I realize this posting might just harm my so-called âConservative credentials,â if I actually had any to begin with; but personally, I really do not care, to be quite honest. Glenn Greenwald is a liberal, Democrat and has written very extensively on the misdeeds and unconstitutional acts of the United States Government. One of the of the good things about Glenn Greenwald is that he is absolutely consistent in his stance against some of the unconstitutional acts of this Government under the banner of the âWar on Terrorism.â When I was still a part of the âcheering squadâ for the left and Bush was still much in control; Greenwald was a daily reader for me.
One thing you should know about Mr. Greenwald is that the same criticisms that Glenn has against the Obama Administration is the SAME ones that he had against the Bush Administration. This is why I do truly like what he is doing; politics be damned, we must hold this Governmentâs feet to the fire at all times. Otherwise, they will trample over us, like we do not exist. This is what Glenn Greenwald does, and this is why I am adding him to my âHonest Liberalsâ blogroll on this site. While I disagree with him on politics; I agree with what he is doing, which is keeping them honest.
One of the reasons why I say all the above, is because of pieces like this here, which Glenn writes about Obama Administration:
Video:
Quote:
Anyone who observes politics closely has a very low bar of expectations. It’s almost inevitable to become cynical – even jaded – about just how inept and inane top Washington officials are. Still, even processing this through those lowly standards, I just find this staggering. Staggering and repellent. This is an elected official in Congress, the body that the Constitution designed to impose checks on the president’s abuses of power, and she does not have the foggiest idea what is happening in the White House, and obviously does not care in the slightest, because the person doing it is part of the party she leads.
One expects corrupt partisan loyalty from people like Wasserman Schultz, eager to excuse anything and everything a Democratic president does. That’s a total abdication of her duty as a member of Congress, but that’s par for the course. But one does not expect this level of ignorance, the ability to stay entirely unaware of one of the most extremist powers a president has claimed in US history, trumpeted on the front-page of the New York Times and virtually everywhere else.
Amen. While I believe the war on terrorism is an important battle; I do not believe the best way to fight it, is by dancing around the constitution to do so. This is why I respect Mr. Greenwald, because he believes that as well. Good show Mr. Greenfield; keep it up!
Update: I realized after I hit publish, that Greenwald is gay. So much for me being a “right-wing gay hater” eh? The truth is, what Glenn does in his private life, is his own damned business. Do I support the lifestyle? No. But that does not mean I cannot respect a man, who happen to be gay, for supporting our constitution — because now, that is what is important. Social Conservatism is great, and it is what I am; but it is not what I want my Country to be modeled after. Because it is the Christian version of Sharia Law and I do not want that in this Country ever. Sharia Law or a Christian Theocracy.
Again Good Job, Glenn — keep it up! From a fan on the “so-called” right.