About the so-called “Whistleblower”

The truth comes about the Republicans paid parrot on Libya:

“He was removed from here because he was a disaster as a manager,” the second employee went on to say, expressing the belief that Hicks’ reassignment had “nothing to do with him being a whistleblower, it had everything to do with his management capacity or lack thereof.” This statement contradicts the narrative promoted on conservative media outlets that Hicks was being forced to remain silent and being punished for speaking out.

The same employees also told ThinkProgress of several troubling incidents involving Hicks and the staff at the Tripoli Embassy both before and after the September 11, 2012 assault in Benghazi. During the aftermath of Benghazi, Hicks showed a lack of diplomatic protocol that both staffers found extremely questionable given the tense times. This includes going to a meeting with the Libyan Prime Minister Mohammed Magarief in a t-shirt, cargo pants, and baseball cap. “I’m too upset to wear a suit,” Hicks allegedly told a staffer. “I want the Libyans to know how upset I am about this attack.”

In testifying before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, Hicks gave some of the most riveting testimony yet on what occurred in Tripoli the night of Sept. 11, 2012, when a diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya was attacked. That detailed account was prefaced by Hicks’ written testimony, which included claims that his superiors praised his performance during the night of the attack, which now rings slightly hollow given the critiques of his colleagues.

When speaking about the night of the attacks, the employees ThinkProgress spoke with described Hicks as being in a daze while other senior Embassy officials organized the evacuation from Tripoli to Germany. “At one point [Hicks] wandered past the huddled State evacuees, muttering to himself, and just sank into a couch,” the first employee relayed to ThinkProgress.

Prior to today, the State Department attempted to chart a middle path on Hicks, seeking to neither give credence to his claims of retribution nor portray him as lacking as a leader. Speaking in the daily press briefing yesterday, State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell told reporters that Hicks’ reassignment was merely part of the Foreign Service Assignment System. “He’s now, per the standard procedure with all the other members of the Foreign Service, working through a preference list that he submitted, and he’s under consideration for positions in the next rotation,” Ventrell said. “So this is all part of the standard procedures.”

via Embassy Staff Undercuts ‘Whistleblower’ Testimony On Benghazi.

I am thinking that the Republicans might have just overreached on this who Libya thing just a little bit.

I also think that only “Whistles” being “blowed” are those of some very well know Republicans who are financing this whole partisan witch hunt. IYNWIMAITYD!

Others: PoliticoThe Moderate VoiceAlan Colmes’ LiberalandYahoo! NewsThe Plum Line,The Maddow BlogDaily KosBBCThe Hugh Hewitt ShowMediaiteThe Gateway Pundit,Washington Free BeaconNational ReviewWall Street JournalJustOneMinuteThe Jawa Report,Wake up AmericaNo More Mister Nice BlogWeasel ZippersThe Lonely ConservativeEd DriscollThe PJ TatlerThe WeekBusiness InsiderNO QUARTER USA NETamericanthinker.com,Patterico’s Pontifications“The Lid”NewsBustersTaylor MarshAtlas ShrugsRed Alert Politics,The Daily CallerJammie Wearing FoolsWeekly StandardJihad WatchTownhall.comThe Other McCainViralReadLe·gal In·sur·rec· tionsusiemadrak.comThe Huffington PostAMERICA RISING and Conservatives4Palin (via Memeorandum)

One thought on “About the so-called “Whistleblower”

All Comments are moderated, IP addresses are recorded, read comment policy before commenting --- Now what you got to say?