I know that I said I was not going to do this; but the more I think about it, the more I believe a response is warranted.

I am referring to my atheist stalker, who wrote a piece about me and proceeded to take a few of my words out of context.

I will address them:

1. The first is that I actually blamed Obama himself for the death of the Chick-Fil-A VP over promotions. This I did, and I am proud of it! Everything is coordinated by this Marxist President, everything….including harassment. If this ruffles a so-called libertarian’s feathers, then so be it. Although, I highly question his so-called libertarian stance. More like a hate-mongering liberal stance.
2. The second is that I made a racist comment about  the Aurora, Colorado shooter. The truth is, from the first photo provided, he did look Latino to me. However, in pictures being shown since then, he does look to be white. I find this to be pretty ironic, considering the fact that when George Zimmerman shot Treyvon Martin, the liberal media just assumed he was white. I have to wonder, did my stalker complain about that too? I highly doubt it. Because he is pretty much too busy stalking “wingnuttia” as he likes to call it.
3. The third laughable complaint that my comments about Alex Jones were “Vile” as he called it. This is coming from a guy, who has the S-word, the F-word, and then goes around making untrue claims about the Christian right and taking their words out of context for mocking purposes. For the record, Alex Jones posted his article that somehow the shooting in Colorado was a Government “false flag” operation. He posted it on the SAME DAY as the shooting, when it was reported that the victims cellphones were actually ringing and how eerie it was to hear that. Did I make an “over the top” comment about Alex Jones? Darned right I did. I cannot stand that awful man and I thought if he did not mind profiting off of the dead bodies of innocent victims, I did not mind bringing his innocent family into the situation; if my stalker thinks that is vile, then I suggest he go look at the current content on his blog and get every swear word off of that site — and then come talk to me about being vile. Otherwise, he should just really shut up.

Again, I believe my stalker has a problem; besides being a God-denying buffoon and quite the fascist — he also suffers from a bad case of projection. Which is something I have known quite a while about him. He has, as I pointed out before, gotten his butt slammed by Pamela Geller once already; I guess he did not learn the first time.

I see that one of my atheist stalkers has returned. (sorry no direct link for him.)

Things must be really slow in Belding, Michigan today; because that is the only time that he links to me.

Update: I also noticed something else as well; When Ed had his blog over on ScienceBlogs, I never noticed him using foul language on his blog. Now that he has moved to his own domain, he has taken to using gutter language. Now, I will to the first to admit, that at times, I have done the same thing here. However, the use of that sort of language around here is not the norm.

My point is this: I do not mind the criticism of my worldview and my political worldview at all. It comes with the territory and I am big enough of a man to take the heat. However, I feel that if you use that sort of language, when expressing your disagreement with me; you cheapen your legitimacy with me. Yes, I know; I swore at Ed, once. Because I thought he was attacking me; turns out, he was attacking something that I had posted, that someone else had written.  This was a mistake on my part; I admit that. However, when I go to a critic’s website and I see the F-word and the S-word being bandied about like that. I tend to take the criticism with a grain of salt.

Furthermore, When I see something that I have written, taken totally out of context and being presented as something that it is not; I tend to want to ignore it.

Lastly, it is quite obvious that this man wants a full on blog war with me. I believe the last time he tried that, with Pamela Geller, he was made to look like quite the idiot. But yet, he wants to come after me. I will made it easy for him. I simply do not engage in blog wars anymore. They accomplish nothing and only tend to make the two parties warring look like two idiots, with self-importance issues. So, thanks Ed; but no. I won’t do it, not this time, not ever again.

That is all.