Romney Leading Paul in Paul in Iowa Poll

It is starting to look like Romney might just be the man who gets the GOP nod. It is early, but I have that feeling.

The Des Moines Register’s latest Iowa Poll shows a surprise three-way match-up in contention to win the Iowa Republican caucuses: Mitt Romney, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum.
Santorum, who has been largely invisible in the polls throughout the campaign season, is now beating the other evangelical choices and has a clear shot at victory Tuesday night.
But political analysts note there’s little time for Santorum to cash in and regroup before New Hampshire, where voters weigh in nine days from now, while Romney is positioned to replicate what he’s done in Iowa in all the early states.
In four days of polling, Romney leads at 24 percent, Paul has 22 percent and Rick Santorum, 15 percent.
But if the final two days of polling stand alone, the order reshuffles: Santorum elbows out Paul for second.
“Few saw this bombshell coming,” GOP strategist David Polyansky said. “In an already unpredictable race this is another stunning turn of political fortune.”

The piece goes on to talk about Santorum; who I utterly despise as a human being. The only reason that Santorum is getting traction at all, is because of the collapse of Bachmann’s campaign. Of course, polls mean nothing, they are simple snapshots into the minds of those taking the poll. What honestly counts is the actual caucuses themselves.

Either way, it should be very interesting.

Other sites covering this subject, right and left — via Memeorandum: CNN, The Politico, Iowa Caucuses, Washington Post, Hot Air, FiveThirtyEight, The Moderate Voice, msnbc.com, Patterico’s Pontifications, Washington Monthly, 2012 Decoded, New York Times, Outside the Beltway, Daily Kos, Business Insider, americanthinker.com, The Iowa Republican, ABCNEWS, The Huffington Post, Big Government, The Caucus, Guardian, Ballot Box, The Daily Caller, The Atlantic Online, Catholic Bandita, A plain blog about politics, Campaign 2012, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, Talking Points Memo, The Spectacle Blog, Mediaite, The Page, State of the Union, Balloon Juice, GOP 12, Riehl World View, Politisite, Associated Press, Saint Petersblog and Yahoo! News

The dumbest thing President Obama said in 2011

I have to give credit to this President; he might be a very smart man. Nerd However, some of the stuff that comes out of his mouth? Raised Eyebrow Not so much. Doh

Conservative Blog HotAir.com released their much anticipated “Obamateurism of the Year for 2011.”

Here is what the readers of that blog, which includes me; decided was the dumbest thing that President Obama said:

Just how much hubris and chutzpah is in a statement like this? Let me count the ways. Rolling Eyes

So, what have we gotten with Obama, since he took office? Let’s look.

These come via the Right Sphere:

Some items are not restricted to 2011 but all are since President Obama took office in January 2009. So without further ado:
10) – Golf Outings
President Obama played 32 rounds of gold in 2011, besting his previous record highs of 2010 and 2009. Not a big deal by itself and certainly he is as entitled to some relaxation just like the rest of us, but maybe he should consider just a little less time on the greens and a little more focused on real problems.
9) – Air Force One
President Obama has flown more miles on Air Force One than any previous president, at an average of $181,757 per hour. In 2010 alone, Obama used Air Force One 172 times. That’s a lot of mileage.
8 ) – Fast and Furious
Attorney General Eric Holder and the DOJ through the BATF put 2,000 guns in the hands of Mexican drug cartel members which have been used in more than 180 violent crimes including the murder of a US Government agent. There are still 1,400 unrecovered weapons floating around Mexico.
7) – Food Stamps
In January 2009 when Obama took office there we approximately 32,000,000 people collecting food stamps. As of August 2011 that number had swelled to approximately 46,000,000 people for an increase of 43.8% in less than 3 years. This is just one indicator of the failure of the liberal economic agenda.
6) – Regulatory Burden
Since January 2009 government regulations have added $38 billion in new costs. Total regulatory costs are now estimated at $1.75 trillion per year. In the same time period the enforcement workforce is up 13%, and enforcement budgets are up 16%.
5) – Personal Income
When Obama took office personal income was $12.1 trillion in January 2009, and has risen to $13.0 trillion as of November 2011. That’s a whopping 7.4% increase (not adjusted for inflation), if only the other economic numbers were held to such a low increase we’d actually be okay. Alas, they’re not.
4) – Unemployment
The U3 rate was 7.7% in January 2009, rose to 10.0% by year end 2009 and is now 8.6%, that’s an 11.7% increase, while the U6 was 10.4% in January 2009, rose to 17.3% by year end 2009 and is now 15.6%, for a 50.0% increase. Remember that stimulus plan that was going to cut unemployment by 1.5-2.0%. Oops.
3) – Deficit Spending
The liberal attitude toward spending has run completely unbridled under President Obama with an FY2009 deficit of $1.4 trillion, an FY2010 deficit of $1.3 trillion, an estimated deficit for FY2011 of $1.3 trillion and an estimated deficit for FY2012 of $1.1 trillion. As an added bonus, that 2012 estimate is already being acknowledged as considerably lower than the real numbers will be eventually.
2) – National Debt
When Obama took office the US Debt was $9.9 trillion and today, thanks to the deficit spending noted in #3, it is above $15.5 trillion and will hit $16.4 trillion by the end of September 2012. Liberal economists assured us that incurring new debt was essential to a recovery – but we have no recovery, only a 56.6% increase in the total debt. If only this was the same percentage increase as personal income we might be okay but it’s not and now we’re screwed.
1) – The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Nothing needs to be said except Obamacare is nothing but a foundation on which to build a disaster of epic proportions and has already had large parts declared unconstitutional by the Courts.
So there you have it, our abbreviated list of things you can thank President Obama and the liberal intelligentsia for as we head into a new year. If only we could hope for better in 2012, but it’s just not in the cards. Unless fiscal sanity is restored, the welfare state is reduced and the size of government is trimmed we, regrettably, have little to look forward to in 2012.

Best President since JFK? Lincoln? FDR? According to whom? More like since or worse than, maybe Carter!

For what it is worth; and I really should not have to even mention this — But, because I know how black Liberals minds work — This has zero to do with skin color. I do not dislike Obama because he is black. In fact, I am very glad that America elected a black President. However, I dislike the man’s polices and it is proven fact that President Barack Obama has been a abysmal failure, not just to the business community, but to the general public as a whole and to the Country. The very people he played like a fiddle to get elected, are the same very one’s who are STILL suffering, even after his election.

So, this statement is, in fact, one of his worst; so much in fact, that the program that he gave this interview for, did not even broadcast it. But rather, put it on their website. Because they knew how horrible it sounded. It is pretty bad, when the very liberal media that went into the tank for this man, has to hide idiotic things he has said, all to protect him and his moronic image that everyone by now knows, is nothing more than a silly lie.

Happy New Year Mr. President — Keep the stupidity coming — I need the content. Tongue Winking Big Grin

The folly of Erick Erickson

I have read some stupid stuff that this joker has written before, including his idiot smearing of me in the past, by some of his sock puppets at that joke of a site of his; but this right here takes the cake.

Here is ol’ Erick Erickson going full on anti-Christian bigot:

No Surprise, Iowa Social Conservatives Are About To Shoot Us All in the Foot Again
Posted by Erick Erickson
Wednesday, December 28th at 4:02PM EST
I’m hearing several campaigns and external pollsters have a surge for Rick Santorum. With the National Review folks fawning over him again, it probably means a surge is real and any surge by Rick Santorum is another factor ensuring Mitt Romney wins the nomination. (To be fair, this doesn’t look like real momentum)
Santorum has no money or organization outside of Iowa and cannot win the nomination, but Iowans love a guy who sucks up to them and makes sure they know he loves the babies.
As a pro-lifer myself, I have to throw up a bit in my mouth that Iowa conservatives are seriously considering Rick Santorum, which will only help Mitt Romney, a guy who even after his supposedly heartfelt conversion to life put some seriously pro-abortion judges on the Massachusetts bench hiding behind the “Well it was Massachusetts for Pete’s sake” defense.
Let’s remember Rick Santorum could not even win re-election in his home state of Pennsylvania.
Rick Santorum also supported Arlen Specter over Pat Toomey in the U.S. Senate back in 2004.
But most damning to me is Rick Santorum’s actual record in the Senate and House of Representatives. I keep hearing him say he was such a paragon of fiscal conservative virtue, when he was anything but that. He was as go along to get along as all the other Republicans who led to our downfall.

Okay, let me explain something to this simple-minded idiotic buffoon. There are three legs of Conservatism — as explained and used very well by President Ronald Reagan. Those legs are social conservatives, foreign policy conservatives and economic conservatives. The late President Reagan built an alliance of these three groups of conservatives that changed the political landscape of the Nation.

The point I am trying to make here is this; try winning the Nomination of the Republican Party, much less the election for President of the United States without any one of these legs of the stool. If the evangelical base does not like a Republican candidate, he can forget about being elected, that is why John McCain lost. Not because of Sarah Palin, in fact she boosted his support! It was because most rib-rocked Conservatives saw John McCain is a petty phony and too much of a moderate. Furthermore, the evangelical Christian base was not impressed with McCain second trophy wife and little slut dressing daughter.

That is why McCain lost and Obama won, because the Republicans stayed home and did not vote, because the candidate did not appeal to the base. That base is made up; again, of social conservatives, foreign policy conservatives and economic conservatives; if you try to win an election or even a primary without one of these groups, you are spinning your wheels. This is why Ron Paul and others are trying to win their votes.

This, again, proves to me, that Mr. Erickson should not be taken seriously, at all.

Others: Washington Monthly, Campaign 2012, Balloon Juice, The Daily Caller and The Atlantic Online

Politics and Common Sense

There seems to be a disturbing affliction in politics in this modern age and in the no-so-modern age as well. It seems to afflict a good number of people, who dare to make their careers in what has commonly become known as the “beltway.” This affliction only seems to be found among those who are of the ruling class, or at least among those who have chosen to live their lives as public servants. I am referring, of course, to something that is usually found more commonly among the working class and everyday families and individual people all across this Country —- Good old-fashioned common sense.

There is, sadly, in this modern day age a real honest shortage of common sense; those who have any semblance of common sense and actually use it are truly blessed. However, in my older years, I am finding that education level to common sense ratio to be lower among those who are of the higher level of education class — classic example; Ron Paul.

I am of course referring to the issue of the newsletters that were published with Ron Paul’s name attached to them back in the 1990’s. It appears that again the liberal left and of course, the Wilsonian Neo-Conservative right are again bringing these newsletters to light — and rightly so. I have seen the contents of these newsletters for myself, as someone who did not grow up in what I like to call the “White Tidy” suburbs; but rather on the Southwest Side of Detroit, Michigan or as it is now commonly called the “inner city” or as I sometimes call it “The Ghetto.”

I was very appalled by what I read in those newsletters. I detest Multiculturalism; because Multiculturalism is liberal socialist code-speak for “Be ashamed that you are white.” However, my disdain of this liberal practice does not equate my hatred of any other race. This is why when I read those newsletters and saw what sort of bigoted filth was in them against blacks, Latinas and yes Jews. The little boy who grew up around many different sorts of ethnic backgrounds, in the City of Detroit, was quite angry that a man, much less a public elected official would allow such tripe in something attributed to him by name.

Whether or not the Newsletters were penned by Ron Paul or not is a non-issue to me. What is an issue to me is that Ron Paul never took the time to look at these newsletters to see what was in them. Again, this simply goes back to the thing I spoke of above — common sense. Ron Paul seems to have a lack of common sense. I believe that speaks of his character and judgment. Furthermore, the fact that he does fellowship with those of a bigoted mindset is telling of his personality. A perfect example, receiving donations from Don Black and David Duke who are the founders of the Neo-Nazi website Stormfront.org and former Klansmen — and not bothering to return said donations.

Again, this all goes back to the very thing that is lack amongst the political ruling class in this Country — Common Sense — and it is seriously lacking on Ron Paul’s part.

Coulter flips her cork…..again

Must be the new boyfriend or something. All those orgasms going to her brain, I guess.

Via Reason:

I have stated my position on Ron Paul here.

Jim Hoft says

What happened?
I leave the country for a week, and Ann Coulter loses her mind!

There are some who would say she lost it eons ago. Silly But, I digress. Dont tell anyone

But seriously, I believe she was most likely either being funny; or at the very least just being very anti-Newt. But Ron Paul Ann? Jeez. I would think of a few others that one would could support, besides him.

But, then again, we are talking about Ann Coulter here. Hee hee

No, Ron Paul will not elected President

Need a few reasons? Here’s twelve good reasons.

However, Panic is setting in in Iowa.

Ed Morrissey says for good reason too:

How likely would it be that a publisher made a million dollars in revenues from his enterprise, managed to employ his family at the business, and yet never bothered to look at its product? Zero, even if one buys the argument that Paul allowed other people to ghost-write the newsletter under his own name and in the first person without ever reviewing their output to make sure that it didn’t contradict his own political stands. And even if people are prepared to swallow all of that, the fact remains that Paul made millions as a publisher peddling vile, racist tracts and insane conspiracy theories, which any Democratic opponent would produce in toto during a general election, even disregarding Team Obama’s predilection for oppo research.
It’s not just the top job that’s at risk, either. With a man like Paul and his newsletter baggage on a national ticket, how would that help Republicans win Senate and House races around the country? It’s no wonder that some in the Iowa GOP have begun to “panic,” and it’s probably not limited to Iowa, either.

Not only this, but go have a look at one blogger’s site, after she dared to speak out against Paul. Also, look here at more of it.

Now , honestly, do Ron Paul’s followers and supporters really honestly believe that this is helping their dear leader’s changes of being elected President? Now, I will let it be known; I do not support Wilsonian foreign policy and I happen to agree with Ron Paul’s stance on domestic issues —- however, I find this sort of behavior to be deplorable. I mean, to go onto a Jewish woman’s website and act like that? My God. Surprised smile

I also do not support Ron Paul’s style of foreign policy disengagement either. Some call it Isolationism; I think it is worse than that, it is disengagement from the world and we cannot afford that, at all. “Peace through strength” is what I believe in, it worked for Ronald Reagan and it worked for me. Anything more than this, is not Conservative and anything less is irresponsible.

This is why I do not support the man; because his supporters are just flat out batty insane. The sick part is, Ron Paul will not condemn them, nor will he ask them to stop with the craziness and the poll stuffing and fraud. It is sick and it makes the political process in America, to the rest of the world, look like a silly carnival show.

So, yeah, Ron Paul won’t be President and for very good reasons too.

I’m still around…..

I just have not been in much of a mood to write anything. I guess you could say that the reality of losing my other blog and being remanded to the confines of a sucky BlogSpot blog has finally set in.

I really should not say that though; PoliticalByline.com had ran its course, it was like a sitcom really, and I had just felt that it had ran its course. Someday, I might put the thing back up as an archive to what I really did, which I felt was quite a bit of work, for little or no pay; but I digress. The problem was, with that blog, my enemies or my critics were defining me and I just grew tired of that.

I have been really trying to put my nose back in the “good book,” that being the Bible. I have really been trying to stick to a daily reading discipline. Heck, I have a audio DVD of Alexander Scorby and I love reading along with him. I will be honest though, I have been failing miserably at reading everyday. Sad smile I just cannot bring myself to do it; and when I want to do it, something else comes up. I know, it is no excuse; but right now, my head is just not into it. it is kind of like this blog and politics, I know I should be writing at least something about what is going on politically now; but, my head is just not into it at all. I could really care less anymore about any of it. The Republican Party, is going to put into the general election a establishment beltway seasoned person and the GOP is going to lose in 2012 and we’ll have four more years of Obama to kick around. Which has become a bit of a cottage industry for the right.

Further more, I just do not believe what I have to say about politics really matters anymore; and my site numbers prove that; nobody gives two flips about what I have to say. Which is why I really am not into the blogging thing anymore. I admit it, I rode a way for a while and now that little fake period, that being the tea-party, is over; and we’re back to business as usual in the beltway.

So, there you are; where I am at, and where my head is, as of late. It isn’t in politics, that is for sure.

Why doesn’t Herman Cain just stop?!?!?!

What.a.joke… This guy makes Alan Keyes look like a rather sane person.

The Video:

Georgia Woman Claims 13-Year Affair with Herman Cain: MyFoxATLANTA.com

The Story via Fox Atlanta:

ATLANTA, Ga. – An Atlanta businesswoman is breaking her silence, claiming she has been involved in a 13-year-long affair with Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain.
Over the Thanksgiving weekend, FOX 5 senior I-Team reporter Dale Russell sat down with Ginger White, who had a story to tell.
“I’m not proud,” White told Russell. “I didn’t want to come out with this. I did not.”
White was worried a political tsunami was headed her way. So, she decided to head it off, by confessing she was involved in a 13-year-long affair with presidential hopeful Herman Cain.
“It was pretty simple,” White said. “It wasn’t complicated. I was aware that he was married. And I was also aware I was involved in a very inappropriate situation, relationship.”
Ginger White says she met Herman Cain in the late 90s in Louisville, Kentucky, when as president of the National Restaurant Association, he made a presentation. She was impressed. She says they shared drinks afterwards and he invited her back to his hotel room.
“’I’d like to see you again,’” White said Cain told her. “’You are beautiful to me, and I would love for us to continue this friendship.’”
She says in his hotel room, he pulled out a calendar and invited her to meet him in Palm Springs. She accepted, and she says the affair began.
“He made it very intriguing,” White told FOX 5. “It was fun. It was something that took me away from my humdrum life at the time. And it was exciting.”
She says he gave her his newly-published book, Leadership is Common Sense, and he wrote: “Miss G, you have already made a ‘big difference!’ Stay focused as you pursue your next destination.”
She says during the next 13 years, he would fly her to cities where he was speaking and he lavished her with gifts. She says they often stayed at the Ritz Carlton in Buckhead and dined at The Four Seasons restaurant. She says he never harassed her, never treated her poorly, and was the same man you see on the campaign trail.

I’d say he is done. I could understand one accusation; but this is getting to be a pattern. Time for Herman Cain to wrap it up.

I mean, what does it say about the Republican Party; when it’s resident Isolationist has better morals than it’s resident token black candidate? Something is horribly amiss here and it needs to be fixed.

Others: ABCNEWS, Campaign 2012, The Strata-Sphere, Ace of Spades HQ, Mediaite, Hugh Hewitt’s TownHall Blog, The Reaction, AlterNet, 2012.talkingpointsmemo.com, The Caucus, Daily Kos, Business Insider, Pundit & Pundette, Washington Wire, Los Angeles Times, Hot Air, FilmLadd Blogs, msnbc.com, Gawker, TBogg, Taylor Marsh, Balloon Juice, Orlando Sentinel, The Atlantic Online, RedState, TVNewser, We are respectable negroes, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, The Political Carnival, TalkLeft, Outside the Beltway, Ben Smith’s Blog, Iowa Caucuses, RealClearPolitics Video Log, Taegan Goddard’s …, Little Green Footballs, Poynter, Verum Serum, NO QUARTER, Bob Owens and The Page, more at Mediagazer » (via Memeorandum)

Special Comment: Explaining my lack of writing

I do not know quite how to start this, so I will just write. People like me, who have Attention Deficit Disorder, tend to shun things that disinterest them. Right now politics is very high on that list. My friends, I am just going to be brutally honest. I am not impressed at all, with any of these candidates. They might have some honest intentions, but right now, the Republican Party looks like a silly freak show.

Honestly, does the Republican National Committee believe that any of these people have a snowballs chance in hell of beating the current President? Let me be blunt, No, none of them do, at all. I mean, look at what we have here; we have a wide-eyed girl from Minnesota, who looks like an escapee from a shrieking harpy PTA club. We have a flip-flopping Mormon Moron, who wrote the foundation for Obamacare. We have a one-man minstrel show, whom, on his good days; makes the entire black race look like the buffoons that people like David Duke say that they actually are. You have a serial philanderer, who, like the 43 President of the United States, wants to keep America at perpetual state of war. You have a Roman Catholic, who is an utter bigot and a terminal a-hole, which should not even be in politics, much less a Father to those children that he has. You also have a senile old isolationist, who also happens to be an anti-Semite and a racist bigot.

Oh, there are others too; but these are the ones, that anyone remotely gives a remote care about; and frankly, they all stink. Folks, if this is the best that the Republican Party can do, we as a nation are freaking screwed. What will happen is this; the GOP will select the most moderate candidate that they can pick; most likely Romney, and that person will run against Obama and lose, just as McCain did. The Republican Party and the Conservatives who vote for that party have been pining for a Ronald Reagan type and sorry; there just is not one in this fold at all.

Ronald Reagan is dead, his type of Conservatism that lead the GOP to victory in the 1980’s is dead and is now replaced with this idiot tripe that the Republican Party is now pimping out to its people as Conservatism. Ronald Reagan struck the right balance and set the right tone; and was able to win his own base and the moderates in the Democratic Party and much of the independents as well. Aside from the lone senile isolationist, the rest of these idiots who are running are running on a divisive platform that will do nothing to unite the Country, and are running on a “God Mandate” political agenda. I am a Christian and I am a Conservative, but these people who seem to believe that they are on a mission from their supposed gods to defeat the President of the United States in an election worry me very much so. Religion and politics just do not mix, and the very wrong-headed “God and Country” movement of the 1980’s was living proof of that.

Frankly, folks, I am just darned bored of it all; politics, especially on the right, has turned into a freak show anymore and I just really am not into it anymore.

By the way —-Happy Thanksgiving to you and your families, from mine.

I got news for liberals: Hillary would not be any better!

I have to laugh when I see stuff like this here.

This comes from the WSJ, two Democratic Pollsters are in full on, “We have to save our Party!” mode:

When Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson accepted the reality that they could not effectively govern the nation if they sought re-election to the White House, both men took the moral high ground and decided against running for a new term as president. President Obama is facing a similar reality—and he must reach the same conclusion.
He should abandon his candidacy for re-election in favor of a clear alternative, one capable not only of saving the Democratic Party, but more important, of governing effectively and in a way that preserves the most important of the president’s accomplishments. He should step aside for the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Never before has there been such an obvious potential successor—one who has been a loyal and effective member of the president’s administration, who has the stature to take on the office, and who is the only leader capable of uniting the country around a bipartisan economic and foreign policy.
Certainly, Mr. Obama could still win re-election in 2012. Even with his all-time low job approval ratings (and even worse ratings on handling the economy) the president could eke out a victory in November. But the kind of campaign required for the president’s political survival would make it almost impossible for him to govern—not only during the campaign, but throughout a second term.

Boy, you can almost see the sweat on the top of their lips and hear the panicky quiver in their voices. Let me clue the liberals who dare to actually read this blog; Hillary would not be any better at all. She would not be any better of a leader. We would still be in this sucky economy and still have all the problems that we have now.

So, all of this idiotic nonsense about Hillary is just overly stupid. Plus too, Hillary has made it clear that once her Secretary of State term is up, she is out of politics for good. So, all of this wishing and asking and such is for naught.

Sorry Democrats, you voted this turkey in and now you get to watch him get trounced in the election of 2012.