This could be problematic for Donald Trump

Good morning from Detroit, it’s 4:28 a.m. and my body clock has been turning somersaults as of late. So, I am up rather early. Hopefully, I get this straightened out.

Memeorandum, which is a pretty cool site and a good tool for bloggers; is reporting this morning that a bunch of woman are reporting that Donald Trump did some pretty bad stuff to them.

This, my friends, is problematic. There is a third rail in politics and that is sexual abuse, of any sort. Both parties are that way, and if you hit that rail, you will end up without a political career. This is nothing new, it has been this way for many, many decades.

Even Pat Buchanan, who is a very sane voice in the conservative movement and one of Trump’s biggest supporters; is beginning to concede that Trump’s path to the White House might be drying up, speaking on this very subject, he says:

Trump exposed the fraudulence of the Clintons’ clucking concern for sexually abused women, brought Pence back into camp, turned the tables and changed the subject from the Trump tapes to the Trump triumph at Washington University.

Upshot: The Donald is alive.

While his path to 270 electoral votes still looks more than problematic, there is a month to go before the election, and anything can happen.

Indeed, it already has — many times.

Indeed, it is a month out, and anything can happen; it is not looking good from the realist standpoint. That being said, I am still voting for him; because I cannot, in good conscience, vote for that dreadful woman. I would be going against everything I know to be right, to do so.

Others, from both sides politically: Vox, Slate, Politico, Power Line, The Hill, Washington Post, USA Today, The Last Refuge, The Daily Beast, The Daily Caller, The Gateway Pundit, Political Wire, Daily Kos, CBS Miami, Mediaite, WCTX-TV, Media Matters for America, The Moderate Voice, France 24, The Root, Independent Journal Review, Mother Jones, ThinkProgress, BuzzFeed, Occupy Democrats, KTLA, Politicus USA, Reuters, Raw Story, NBC News, Hit & Run, The Week, Law News, Hot Air, Talking Points Memo, NPR, New York Magazine, CBS New York, Mashable, The Right Scoop, alan.com, Balloon Juice, Business Insider, AOL, The New Civil Rights Movement, Guardian, RedState, Little Green Footballs, TVNewser, Lawyers, Guns & Money, Patterico’s Pontifications, Jezebel and The Resurgent, The Moderate Voice, RedState, The Week, Politico, Vox, Independent Journal Review, Guardian, Media Matters for America, AOL, Daily Kos, Occupy Democrats, BuzzFeed, Talking Points Memo, Mediaite, New York Magazine, The Atlantic, Political Wire, Lawyers, Guns & Money and Jezebel, more at Mediagazer », Vox, Politico, Business Insider, Lawyers, Guns & Money, Washington Post, Occupy Democrats, twitchy.com, Media Matters for America, Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, Mediaite, RedState, Suburban Guerrilla …, Politicus USA, New York Magazine and Gothamist

I wish I could feel sorry….

You reap, what you sow…:

In April I went into the hospital and stayed there a week. Subsequently, I have gone back numerous times. In fact, I have spent more time in the hospital this year than all the rest of my life combined. My lungs were filling with clots and I could barely breath. By the time I got admitted, my blood-oxygen level was below 90%. While I was there, doctors found a tumor in my wife’s right lung. In June, she had it removed and on the day of surgery the doctors found a new growth on her left lung. The one was removed on a Tuesday and the other that Friday. My wife, it turns out, has a very uncommon form of lung cancer that only affects non-smoking women. – Source: If I Die Before You Wake… | The Resurgent

I wish that I could sit here and write that I felt a slight twinge of sympathy for this man. But, if I wrote that, I would be straight up lying. This man allowed on his former blog; which he started and ultimately got a financial bail out from Townhall, because of his inability to run an effective business — his users to smear me, lie about me and defame me on a regular basis. I have no pity for him at all. You allow bad things to happen to other people, bad things happen to you. It is Biblical:

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. – (Galatians 6:7-8 KJV)

Right now, this man, is reaping what he sowed.

Others: Outside the beltway

The utter hypocrisy of the “Christian Right”

I have to say, the so-called “Christian Right” has fallen away from what it once was in the 1980’s. As you know, and as I blogged about at about four this morning, Trump got caught on a hot mic saying some pretty nasty stuff about a woman.

This is what amazes me to no end. The so-called “Christian Right” has pretty shrugged the shoulders and said, “Oh Well…”.

Click here for the story via the Daily Beast. I shall quote some interesting parts:

The fact that Donald Trump said in 2005 that he could grab women “by the p*ssy” because he’s famous doesn’t seem to be changing how social conservative leaders feel about him.

Evangelicals who opposed him before still aren’t fans. And the ones in his camp aren’t phased by the recording. That’s because this isn’t about how much they like the brash billionaire; it’s about how unflinching they are in their opposition to Hillary Clinton.

“People of faith are voting on issues like who will protect unborn life, defund Planned Parenthood, defend religious liberty and oppose the Iran nuclear deal,” said Ralph Reed, who heads the Faith & Freedom Coalition.  “A ten-year-old tape of a private conversation with a talk show host ranks low on their hierarchy of concerns.”

This whole thing that I just quoted above, encapsulates the entire downfall and compromise of the Evangelical Christian right. Now, I happen to be 44 years old and I remember the Reagan era very well and I remember the militancy of the Christian Right. Could you imagine, if you are old enough to recall; what would have happened to Ronald Reagan, if something like that would have broken, during his bid for the Presidency? Ronald Reagan would have been shamed out of the Presidential race in an instant!

The reasoning for this reasoning of this, “eh, it happens” stance, is this:

Robert Jeffress, the pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas and a member of Trump’s Evangelical Executive Advisory Board, said the comments were “lewd, offensive, and indefensible.”

But, he added, he’s still voting Trump. He said he moderated a meeting between the candidate and Evangelical and Catholic leaders, and he was forthright about his hesitations about Trump’s moral

“I said at that time, with Trump sitting next to me, I would not necessarily choose this man to be my child’s Sunday School teacher,” Jeffress said. “But that’s not what this election is about.”

He added that he doesn’t think Hillary Clinton is morally superior to Trump.

“Here is a woman who lied to the families of the Benghazi victims, she destroyed 33,000 emails while under subpoena, and she’s attacked the women who attacked her husband,” he said. “The fact is we’re all sinners, we all need forgiveness, and God doesn’t grade people according to their level of sin.”

And David Bozell, a Roman Catholic who heads the conservative group ForAmerica and supports Trump, said the audio won’t change how conservative voters view the candidate.

“Bill Clinton’s history of being a sexual predator, including affairs with interns, dwarfs any locker room banter,” he said. “The clip is unfortunate, but then again, we’re not electing saints in November.”

Unbelievable. The reasoning is, “Donald Trump is pretty bad; But Hillary Clinton is worse.” This is a fatal flaw and bad reasoning. It also is a sure sign of the apostasy within the ranks of the Evangelical Church.

Now, do not misunderstand me here; I am voting for Trump and I will be holding my nose. However, as a Christian and an Independent Fundamentalist Baptist; I would expect those who claim to represent me and my beliefs to at least take more of a stand on an issue much as this one.

Other Bloggers: Vox, ThinkProgress, CNN, Mediaite, The Last Tradition, Us Weekly, Business Insider, FiveThirtyEight, Jezebel, The Gateway Pundit, Media Matters for America, The Verge, electionlawblog.org, portal.liberalamerica.org, Los Angeles Times, Independent Journal Review, New York Times, ABC News, Joe.My.God., CBS Los Angeles, Bloomberg, The FADER, KATU-TV, TheStreet.com, National Review, Hit & Run, Mashable, Florida Politics, The Times of Israel, Outside the Beltway, Daily Kos, Law News, RT, Boing Boing, Mother Jones, Washington Monthly, Scott Adams’ Blog, CBS San Francisco, Gothamist, The Daily Caller, Politico, BizPac Review, BuzzFeed, Off the Kuff, Politicus USA, fox13now.com, Occupy Democrats, The Atlantic, The Huffington Post, Page Six, Fox 59, Fox News Insider, FOX2now.com, Forbes, Electoral-vote.com, Talking Points Memo, USA Today, Taylor Marsh, Power Line, The Stranger …, bet.com, WREG-TV, Media Matters for America, TVNewser, NO QUARTER USA NET, Liberal Values, TMZ.com, CBS Philly, Patterico’s Pontifications, KTLA, abc7.com, CBS New York, TalkLeft, Heat Street and Althouse, – Via Memeorandum

I knew they’d dig something up

I said it a long while back on this blog and it turns out that I was absolutely correct.

It appears that the media has dug something up about Donald Trump that has him reeling and apologizing.

If anything, it shows a desperation of the liberal-left and possibly those on the neocon right to stop this guy from being president of the United States.

I just hope it doesn’t damage Trump fatally; because I don’t think this country could handle Hillary Clinton presidency.

On last night’s debate

A lot of you are probably wondering why I haven’t written about the debate at all.

The truth is folks, I am still very much burned out on politics and writing in general. In fact, I am dictating this blog posting using voice to text and WordPress for Android and the voice to text feature on my phone. (except for a link insertion)

Now, you can go here and read all about the debate; who won, who lost and all that sort of stuff. Me personally? I could quite frankly care less about it.

Ever since the big let-down in 2012, I’ve become pretty much skeptical of any conservative or republican candidate being elected in an election. The reason why I say this it’s because it seems that Republicans and some conservatives have become masters of putting their foot in their own mouth.

Also too, let’s just be real folks Donald Trump has a lot of freakin baggage to plow through and to carry to get to be the president of the United States.

It is my understanding from what I have read some of the prominent supporters of Donald Trump that Donald Trump did not take the opportunity to nail Hillary like he should have. This could cost him in the election; because some people may see him as weak in the face of adversity.

On the other hand, if Donald Trump was too Fierce with her; he would have been called a bully and sexist and misogynistic. So, it’s a case of damned if you do and damned if you don’t in this situation.

I also have this bad case of cynicism when it comes to Donald Trump and his ability to fight back against the global elitists or the globalists, as they are called and to bring back a sort of nationalism in this country.

Hillary represents that establishment and that group of people. I just have this gnawing feeling that those people are not going to go away quietly into the woods and that they are going to fight him with everything that they have; money, media…. everything.

I may sound like the world’s greatest pessimist. But, I happen to be a realist and I have been around for 44 years; and I know the political game pretty well and I know that these people don’t fight fair at all and what they cannot prove, they will float as a lie and get people to believe it and Donald Trump could very well lose.

I really hope that I am wrong, but something tells me, that I am very right.

About that shooting in North Carolina

You might have heard about it. If not, here’s enough links to last a lifetime here.

Here’s my commentary on it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rg2Oo9gN5Q?rel=0

Others: Mashable, KTLA, New York Daily News, NBC News, Power Line, Talking Points Memo, Above the Law, Sputnik International, Bearing Arms, Vox, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, John Hawkins’ Right Wing News, Daily Kos, Vocativ, Hullabaloo, AOL, Hot Air, FOX News Radio, Associated Press, The Root, BizPac Review, National Review, The Atlantic, Raw Story, Independent Journal Review, WCNC-TV, Refinery29, The New Civil Rights Movement and USA Today, Al Jazeera English, Breitbart, Raw Story, New York Times, NBC News, NPR, ABC News, WBTV-TV, twitchy.com, CBS News, ThinkProgress, Shakesville, Hit & Run, The Daily Caller, The Root, Guardian, Vocativ, alan.com, WREG-TV, Mashable, BostonGlobe.com, The Gateway Pundit, CBS New York, The American Mirror, The Week, Q13 FOX News, New York Magazine, Occupy Democrats, WAVY-TV, The Moderate Voice, WSOC-TV and Truth Kings, Associated Press, Bearing Arms, FOX News Radio, Front Page Magazine and Vox Popoli, ABC News, CNN, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, Independent Journal Review, Mic, Daily Mail, Tulsa World, BizPac Review, ABC News, Washington Monthly, NPR and Associated Press, TheBlaze.com, RealClearPolitics, John Hawkins’ Right Wing News, twitchy.com, Washington Post, Infowars, The Establishment, New York’s PIX11, The American Conservative, KFOR-TV, Rewire, Vox, Q13 FOX News, Occupy Democrats, AOL, PerezHilton and Independent Journal Review

About that bombing in New York City

I’m sure you heard all about it and you can find the latest about it herehereherehereherehere and here.

I think this right here is a perfect example of the blow back on the so-called “war on terror.” It’s not to say, that I don’t believe that the war on terror does not exist. Oh, I honestly do believe it does exist and terrorism is a real thing.

But, this is what we have to deal with; if we’re going to fight that war. Not only are there Muslims overseas who hate us, there Muslims in this country who hate us and because of that; they’re going to do stuff like this and we have to be on guard for that and be able to prepare ourselves for it.

This is why everytime, I hear some libertarian carping about how the government is becoming too intrusive in our lives; I have to wonder, what do they have to say about things like this right here?

There is a fine line between protecting constitutional rights and protecting the Republic, against threats foreign and domestic and we have walked that line horribly before; and it seems now in the age of Obama and Democrat Party rule or treating terrorism like a Law Enforcement issue. This is wrongheaded and and one of these fine days, it’s going to cause a lot of people to be murdered.

Personally, between you and I; if it came down to protecting many people including myself, from being killed in a terrorist attack and protecting some special snowflakes constitutional rights: I’ll deal with the government intrusion.

And this is coming from someone who leans to the right politically and is not too keen on big government. 

There is a big difference between intrusive big government and the government who simply wants to protect the people from threats foreign and domestic and wise is the man that knows the difference between the two.

Quote of the day

No matter who wins in November, America is going to face a divide unseen in decades. If Donald Trump wins, he will confront a resident media more hateful than that which confronted Richard Nixon in 1968.

If Hillary Clinton wins, she will come to office distrusted and disbelieved by most of her countrymen, half of whom she has maligned either as “deplorables” or pitiful souls in need of empathy.

Not for half a century has the idea of “one nation under God, indivisible,” seemed so distant.

and they have only themselves to blame for it….

Saw this article here this morning on The Jerusalem Post, and I will just give you the last bit of it.

Quote:

On the one hand then, we have the Jewish Democrats who are faced with a party that is increasingly controlled by anti-Semitic forces. And on the other hand we are in the midst of the collective political suicide of the Jewish Republican establishment.

It is hard to know how Israel will be affected by the dramatic enfeeblement of the American Jewish community that we are now witnessing. The fact remains that the vast majority of American support for Israel comes from the evangelical Christian community.

What is clear enough though is that the political waning of the Jewish community across the political spectrum means that the golden era of American Jewry is not only over. It is gone.

The only thing is to blame for this happening, are the Jews that took it upon themselves to meddle in the affairs of the United States Government. These are people who gave us the Iraq War, which we all know, was a disaster; which gave us the current unrest in the middle east, unbridled terrorism, Al-Qaeda and now it’s even more dangerous cousin ISIS.

Because of this happening, there is a new wave of Nationalism that has popped up, especially in the conservative grassroots. Patrick J. Buchanan built upon it in the 1990’s and ultimately, he failed, this article here, explains why Buchanan’s efforts failed and Trump’s are working great.: (H/T to Buchanan.org)

So, why did Trump succeed in leading a hostile takeover of the Republican Party, when Buchanan’s efforts came up so short in 1992? One overriding reason is that the times have indeed changed. When Buchanan warned of globalism and intervention, the successful Gulf War and the Christmas Day 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union weakened that argument. If there really was a “new world order,” America was unquestionably in charge. Today, with memories of the disastrous second Iraq War, China rising and Russia asserting itself again, anti-interventionism is a lot stronger argument. Immigration, too, is an issue far more powerful today. “Back then, there were maybe 3-4 million illegal immigrants,” Buchanan says. “Today, there are maybe 12 million.”

Perhaps the most startling parallel between Buchanan and Trump is the argument of bipartisan betrayal: They both used their pulpit to excoriate elites in both parties for leaving more vulnerable, working-class Americans behind. And on that front, the country has changed profoundly. The central American promise—that our children would live better than we live—has been thrown into grave doubt, at least for those who are part of “the white working class.” Some 5 million manufacturing jobs have been lost since the start of the millennium; incomes for the average factory worker have been stagnant for just about all of the 21st century.

“Those issues started maturing,” Buchanan now says. “Now we’ve lost 55,000 factories. … When those consequences came rolling in, all of a sudden you’ve got an angry country. We were out there warning what was coming. Now, on trade and intervention, America sees what’s come.”

But there’s one other major change that has made Trump’s message far more potent than Buchanan’s: the speed at which a powerful, even divisive idea can travel from one like-minded individual to another. “If Buchanan had had social media he might have done a lot better,” argues Ron Kaufman, a longtime ally of the Bush family, who has spent a lifetime as a Republican operative. “Back then in ’92, people wouldn’t have been hearing about it every 15 minutes. There was no Breitbart, no Politico.”

The rise of talk radio, cable networks and an online echo chamber for political discourse has changed the game for people with an outsider message, whether on the left or the right. Longtime Democratic operative Joe Trippi, who turned the Howard Dean campaign into an online fundraising behemoth in 2004, says: “I think one of the things we have all underestimated is how connected underground networks are these days—from Occupy Wall Street to white supremacists to conspiracy aficionados. … So if a Pat Buchanan came along today, it’s much easier to roll over a party.”

The kinds of attacks Buchanan leveled, alone, at his own Republican Party have become normal political chatter on the right these days, amplified enormously by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and company. Today, an outright majority of Republicans say they believe their leaders have betrayed them, by not fighting harder against President Obama and the left. That sense of betrayal is what led the most militant of House Republicans to take out a very conservative speaker of the House, in John Boehner; that same sense of anger is what helped Trump defeat his opposition in the primary.

This, is why Trump is working, and the old guard of the Republican Party is failing and fading into the sunset. It is about time too. These people lied to America, on more than one occasion and now, their chickens, have come home to roost.