Why is Nancy Pelosi still in the House after saying this?

I mean, if a white person, like me, had said this; I would be out of a job. But not this woman:

In an interview, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi said that she believes Republican Jews are “being exploited,” but she was sure to add, “And they’re smart people.”

Pelosi made the comments in response to whether Jewish voters would support President Barack Obama in the presidential election later this year.

“I think [Obama] will” win the Jewish vote, Pelosi said, when pressed on the subject. “I think that he will, because the fact is when the facts get out. You know, as many of the Republicans are using Israel as an excuse, what they really want are tax cuts for the wealthy. So Israel, that can be one reason they put forth.”

The interviewer then added, “That’s why some of the Republican Jewish supporters are really active.”

Pelosi responded, “Well, that’s how they’re being exploited. And they’re smart people. They follow these issues. But they have to know the facts. And the fact is that President Obama has been the strongest person in terms of sanctions on Iran, which is important to Israel. He’s been the strongest person on whether it’s Iron Dome, David’s Sling, any of these weapons systems and initiatives that relate to Israel. He has been there over and over again.”

via Pelosi: Republican Jews ‘Being Exploited’ | The Weekly Standard

So, I guess if you are a cannoli eating dago, you can say stuff like this. In other words, in liberal logic, if you are a minority, you can take pot shots at other ethnic minorities. However, if you are WASP like me, and you say something like this about the Jews; you would be out of a job.

Just another example of a sick society we live in today. It is also a perfect example of the warped liberal logic of today as well.

Mussolini would be proud, very proud.

Video: Reported Closet Lesbian Kathy Griffin slams 17 year old Willow Palin

When they are not killing Conservative Businessmen, they are doing this sort of asinine behavior.

Video: Via Breitbart.com:

Update: All American Blogger Links in. Thanks!

 

Obama’s Liberal Fascists Kill Donald A. Perry Chick-fil-A’s Vice President of Corporate Public Relations

Yes, I am blaming Obama and his brown shirts. (Update: ….and if anyone does not like it, I think it is just too darned bad… everything is coordinated by this Marxist President, everything — including harassment.)

The story via WRBL-TV:

News 3 has learned that Donald A. Perry, the Vice President of Corporate Public Relations has passed away.

Ross Cathy, the owner of the Midland, GA Chick-fil-A and family member of company CEO, Dan Cathy, tells News 3, Perry passed away this morning from a heart attack.

Chick-fil-A Inc. relased the following statement:

We are saddened to report the news to you that our dear friend Don Perry, vice president of public relations, passed away suddenly this morning.

Don was a member of our Chick-fil-A family for nearly 29 years. For many of you in the media, he was the spokesperson for Chick-fil-A. He was a well-respected and well-liked media executive in the Atlanta and University of Georgia communities, and we will all miss him.

Our thoughts and prayers are with his family.

You can read all about the latest involving intolerant liberal fascists and Chick-fil-A, by going here and here.

Well, Liberals, pat yourselves on the back. You have reached a new level, with me at least. You have actually achieved the feat of driving a man to his grave, with your idiotic and quite fascist ways. Now, bask in the glory that is of murderers. It really should not be of any strange feeling; after all, your people on a daily basis commit the murder of millions of unborn children every year. So, this should not be any different really. The man disagreed with your worldview, and you drove him to his grave.

For the record, the so-called right does it too; namely to me. However, I never thought I would ever see the day, when someone would drop dead, because someone who owns a company dared to take a stand for Christian Morals and gets persecuted for it, even to the point of one his own company officers dying of a massive heart attack.

My friends, this, is the Neo-Left and this; is why I no longer vote progressive — nor will I ever again. 😡

The neo-left, which is represented by the Democratic National Committee; is not the party of Roosevelt or Truman — and is not even remotely the honorable party as referenced by Ronald Reagan. It is a totalitarian fascist party, that is a small wooden bridge’s width away from outright Communism. The sad part is, that is that it is taking American and its people with it.

This is why I continue to blog, even when my own people attack me. This why I fight against the Neo-leftist, Anti-Christian, Anti-Business. progressive menace. Because of stuff, like this here.

God Bless America.

Others: Michelle Malkin, Twitchy, Boing Boing, Outside the Beltway, The Daily Caller, Riehl World View, The Raw Story, Chicago Sun Times, The Hinterland Gazette, Washington Free Beacon, NewsBusters.org and Gawker Datechguy’s Blog, JOSHUAPUNDIT, Wizbang, Clayton Cramer’s Blog, National Review, Sister Toldjah Mother Jones Hot Air, The Huffington Post

Uncertainty at HotAir.com?

I saw the following over at HotAir.com. The topic is rather serious, AllahPundit’s take in it, was very funny.

Quote:

Via the Weekly Standard, I can’t decide if this is newsworthy or not. It’s like when O says he wants to close Gitmo. On the one hand: Hmmm! On the other hand: Meh. It’s not happening, so who cares?

I admit it, I let out a laugh, when I read it. Hmm! Meh and who cares? All in one posting! 😆

Pick a position please… Before the election, preferably!

Video: News and Opinion from CBN

[podcast format=”video”]http://dl2.cbn.com/Newschannel_Morning_072512_WS.mp4[/podcast]

(via)

[podcast format=”video”]http://dl2.cbn.com/NewsBlock_10AM_072512_WS.mp4[/podcast]

(via)

Stakelbeck on Terror: From the Annual CUFI Summit

[podcast format=”video”]http://dl2.cbn.com/Stakelbeck_Terror_072412_WS.mp4[/podcast]

(via)

UPDATE: In response to the stupidity

HUGE UPDATE on January 8, 2013 — EVERYONE PLEASE READ:

My attention has been called to the fact that someone is linking to this and another blog entry of mine, to prove that Zilla is lying. Okay first, this was written before I saw the video of her. I also wrote a retraction to the part about her faking her illness. You can read that here. I was only repeating what someone else told me. Which was a stupid mistake on MY part. I just was pissed because people did me dirty or I would have never repeated what I was told. So, stop linking to this posting. I will not pull the posting, as I want it to stay up, as an example of WHAT NOT TO DO, when blogging.

Anyhow, Zilla, sweetheart, if you read this, I am sorry these idiots a bugging you, again. Some people can really be jerks. :mad:

As for those who did me dirty, my feelings remain the same.

——-

In response to this bunch of stupidity.  (It’s a non-direct link, so don’t worry.)

Sorry, I didn’t get into blogging to be popular; especially from likes of you all.

….and yes, you are faking your illness, a well-known and well respected professional blogger, who gets PAID to do write and blog told me so.

Eh, no worries. I never wanted to be popular, or even really accepted by them. Ankle-biters and Johnny-come-lately’s… All the are. Which is why I ignore them anymore.

I simply say this to them all…..

In German:

Um ehrlich zu sein mit euch allen. Ich könnte wirklich weniger, was Sie wirklich alle von mir denken, egal, überhaupt. Wirklich, ich nicht.

All das, weil ich es gewagt, die Wahrheit über einen idiotischen kriminellen con-Künstler Frau, die er sich zum Narren jeder mit ihr sprechen, denkt liegt etwa krank zu sein. Nicht nur, dass die Hälfte von euch leben von der Bundesregierung und der Rest von euch sind Idioten, die nicht verhaftet zu werden könnte viel weniger Erwerbsarbeit zu finden.

Sie werfen mir vor, nicht mit einer zu wollen für ihren Lebensunterhalt arbeiten. Nun, lassen Sie mich sehen, ich lebe im US-Bundesstaat Michigan. Der Bundesstaat Michigan hat die schlechteste Wirtschaft in der ganzen ganzen Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika. Nicht nur das, aber ich zufällig ein Einzelkind zu sein, der einzige Sohn, meine beiden 60-jährigen Eltern etwas.

Meine Frage an dieser sogenannten “Konservativen” ist dies, wäre es sehr wie Christus von mir zu meinen Eltern zu verzichten und fahre einen semi-LKW sein? Ich habe die Lizenz als solche zu tun. Ich persönlich denke, es wäre der Fluch des Bösen sein, so etwas zu tun, vor allem nach all der Dinge, die meine Eltern für mich in der Vergangenheit getan haben.

Es heißt Respekt. Etwas, diese Dummköpfe wissen nichts davon.

Es ist kein Geheimnis, dass meine amerikanischen Konservatismus nicht ist sehr beliebt bei euch alle überhaupt. Ich weiß, dass es Ihr Wilsonschen Neokonservatismus stört. Einige werfen mir vor Antisemitismus. Für das Protokoll, das tue ich nicht, noch habe ich jemals gehasst Juden überhaupt. Aber als Christ, für mich, hier zu sitzen und sagen, dass die Juden nicht bringen Anklage gegen den Herrn Jesus Christus wäre widersinnig. Die Bibel macht sehr deutlich, wer belogen Christus am Kreuz gelegt …. und es war nicht die Deutschen!

Ich überlasse es Ihnen, alle mit einem Vers aus der Bibel:

So euch die Welt haßt, so wisset, daß sie mich vor euch gehaßt hat. Wäret ihr von der Welt, so hätte die Welt das Ihre lieb; weil ihr aber nicht von der Welt seid, sondern ich habe euch von der Welt erwählt, darum haßt euch die Welt. Gedenket an mein Wort, das ich euch gesagt habe: “Der Knecht ist nicht größer denn sein Herr.” Haben sie mich verfolgt, sie werden euch auch verfolgen; haben sie mein Wort gehalten, so werden sie eures auch halten. Aber das alles werden sie euch tun um meines Namens willen; denn sie kennen den nicht, der mich gesandt hat. Wenn ich nicht gekommen wäre und hätte es ihnen gesagt, so hätten sie keine Sünde; nun aber können sie nichts vorwenden, ihre Sünde zu entschuldigen. Wer mich haßt, der haßt auch meinen Vater. Hätte ich nicht die Werke getan unter ihnen, die kein anderer getan hat, so hätten sie keine Sünde; nun aber haben sie es gesehen und hassen doch beide, mich und den Vater. Doch daß erfüllet werde der Spruch, in ihrem Gesetz geschrieben: “Sie hassen mich ohne Ursache.” Wenn aber der Tröster kommen wird, welchen ich euch senden werde vom Vater, der Geist der Wahrheit, der vom Vater ausgeht, der wird zeugen von mir. Und ihr werdet auch zeugen; denn ihr seid von Anfang bei mir gewesen. — (John 15:18-27 GLB)

…and that’s all I am ever going to say about that. 😀

 

 

Did Mitt Romney get his facts wrong on Reagan?

As I wrote in my previous blog posting about Mitt Romney; there is this little story about Romney getting his facts wrong about Ronald Reagan.

It comes via the Weekly Standard:

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that Mitt Romney is recounting a Jim Baker anecdote in which President Reagan ordered Baker, as White House chief of staff, to hold no national security meetings over a hundred day period early in his first term so that President Reagan and his team could focus on the economy. If the Journal‘s reporting is accurate—and I don’t believe the Romney camp has challenged it—Romney should stop telling this false and foolish tale.

[….]

“Given the challenges a Romney administration will face – from a spiraling Syria to key decisions on the way forward in Afghanistan to dealing with Iran’s nuclear program and the threats from al Qaeda in Yemen and East Africa – it is unlikely Romney will have the luxury of ignoring foreign policy for his first 100 days….But the fact that Romney thinks it would be desirable to ignore the world for his first 100 days is troubling. Yes, the American people are focused on the economy – and understandably so. But Romney isn’t running for treasury secretary – he is running for Commander in Chief. And those responsibilities begin on Day 1 of his presidency.”

What’s more, I can’t believe the story is true. Or if Reagan did once say what Baker says he said, it was an expression of exasperation after one (presumably unsatisfactory) meeting that neither Reagan nor Baker followed through on. In fact, I’ll buy Jim Baker a very good dinner next time he’s in Washington if he or anyone else can find a 100-day stretch (or a ten-day stretch) of the Reagan presidency in which President Reagan was involved in no national security meetings. I encourage interested readers to research this eminently researchable topic, and e-mail us what you find at webeditor@weeklystandard.com. I was able to spend just a few minutes scrolling thought the Reagan Foundation’s helpful account of President Reagan’s daily schedule, and I see no week, let alone three months, in which President Reagan doesn’t seem to have held some sort of national security and foreign policy meetings. To say nothing of the fact that he ran for the presidency highlighting national security issues, and was a historic president in large part because of his national security accomplishments.

So, reminder to Mitt Romney: With respect to the presidency, national security isn’t a bug; it’s a feature.

To be quite honest, I do not believe this to be overly damaging to his campaign; like the previous story I reported, this just seems to be a matter of getting his message tightened up a bit. It might be that Romney was fed some inaccurate information. Although, I have to wonder if this piece by Bill Kristol is not some sort of underhanded Neoconservative attempt to kneecap Romney. It would make sense, Romney has not been exactly thundering hawk, when it comes to Iran. Maybe this is supposed to be a gentle reminder as to who controls the strings in the GOP. Of course, I have to watch it, or the Wilsonian Republican Blogosphere will start a crusade against me again. 😉

 

The U.K. Telegraph prints a bogus story on Mitt Romney

It seems that either The U.K. Telegraph is either getting some bad information or someone over there has an axe to grind with Romney.

The story via The Telegraph:

As the Republican presidential challenger accused Barack Obama of appeasing America’s enemies in his first foreign policy speech of the US general election campaign, advisers told The Daily Telegraph that he would abandon Mr Obama’s “Left-wing” coolness towards London.

In remarks that may prompt accusations of racial insensitivity, one suggested that Mr Romney was better placed to understand the depth of ties between the two countries than Mr Obama, whose father was from Africa.

“We are part of an Anglo-Saxon heritage, and he feels that the special relationship is special,” the adviser said of Mr Romney, adding: “The White House didn’t fully appreciate the shared history we have”.

Mr Romney on Wednesday embarks on an overseas tour of Britain, Israel and Poland designed to quash claims by Mr Obama’s team that he is a “novice” in foreign affairs. It comes four years after Mr Obama’s own landmark foreign tour, which attracted thousands of supporters.

He lands in London early on Wednesday morning, in advance of meetings with David Cameron and other senior ministers on Thursday. He will also meet Ed Miliband and Tony Blair before attending two lucrative fundraisers and the opening ceremony of the Olympics.

[….]

“Obama is a Left-winger,” said another. “He doesn’t value the Nato alliance as much, he’s very comfortable with American decline and the traditional alliances don’t mean as much to him. He wouldn’t like singing ‘Land of Hope and Glory’.”

The two advisers said Mr Romney would seek to reinstate the Churchill bust displayed in the Oval Office by George W. Bush but returned to British diplomats by Mr Obama when he took office in 2009. One said Mr Romney viewed the move as “symbolically important” while the other said it was “just for starters”, adding: “He is naturally more Atlanticist”.

Mr Obama has appeared less interested in relations with London than Mr Bush. He repeatedly rebuffed Gordon Brown when the then-prime minister sought a meeting at the UN in 2009 and was criticised for responding to an elaborate gift with a set of DVDs that did not work in Britain.

The whole quote, if true, has all the trappings of dog-whistle racism. The problem is, according to Jeff over at “The Lid”, not a word of it is even remotely true:

There is one problem with the quote, it is a fraud!

Andrea Saul, Romney’s press secretary, disputed the comments and emphasized that they did not reflect the beliefs of the former Massachusetts governor.

It’s not true. If anyone said that, they weren’t reflecting the views of Governor Romney or anyone inside the campaign,” she told CBSNews.com in an email  I emailed my contact within the campaign who backed up Ms Saul’s response.

The fact that Romney denied that anyone in his campaign made that comment doesn’t matter to the US press, neither does the fact that Mr Swaine hasn’t backed up his charge with proof.

Good work on the part of Jeff to put out the truth on this story. I really do not believe this one to be a effort to knock Romney on the part of the Telegraph; however, I do believe it to be a result of some bad sourcing or planting of a false story, by someone who might have an axe to grind with Mitt Romney. This happens quite a bit in Politics.

However, Mitt Romney does have a bit of another problem, which I am covering in my next blog posting.

Sorry for the blog silence yesterday

A bit of housekeeping: My apologies to those who actually do read here.  I was busy with business related matters yesterday. Plus, life called and I had to tend to personal matters.

I had a huge posting in mind, about what is happening on twitter and with some of my enemies or stalkers, as I like to call them. However, I just cannot justify wasting the bandwidth on them.

So, yes, I am back and I am now going to do a posting on something I think is more important.