I just wonder, how are the Neo-Conservative, Bush-Apologists, going to respond to this?
It should be quite interesting.
I wonder where WorldNetDaily’s outrage will be on this?
Better yet, What will Michelle "I married a rich Jew, to be somebody" Malkin’s response will be?
Should be interesting…. Spin and deny, what the Republicans are good at.
Just saying…
Yeah, I’m keeping some Oddball hours… Better than staying up all night, I suppose.
On the other hand, usually now by 10:00P.M., My bed starts looking very nice, heck, that was usually when I was just getting primed up. Now, at that time, I’m usually ready to quit.
Needless to say, it will take some getting used to.
This is why the postings there have been spotty. It’s quite hard to come up with blogging greatness, when your about half asleep.
Anyhow, I’m sure I’ll be back into the groove sooner or later here.
I, like most of the Political Bloggers are quite tired of this idiot crap, between Barack and Hillary, flipping aye already! Just one of you quit and get it over with, and let’s move on! Preferably BEFORE the convention! This is why I’ve been avoiding writing about the two of them, it’s just a broken record anymore, and the only people getting anything out of it, are the Republicans, the Democrats are just sick of it. Every time something else comes out, it’s all "Oh, look at this!’ or "Oh, Look at that!" Nobody gives a crap anymore man, Least of all me.
Okay, enough of that, I’m rambling… I haven’t had any coffee yet.
And now back to our normal programming… Whatever that is…
Money Quote:
Telling the truth about a candidate for the President of the United States and his connections to extremist men and women is the highest form of truth, and if McCain can’t understand that perhaps he should quit running now, we don’t want him and neither does America.
Yes, Excellent idea! The last thing we need is another "Big Government" Conservative. Not that Obama or Hillary are any better, but at least they’re not on the Geritol……Yet.
Friday April 25, 2008
Memo to WorldNetDaily’s Joseph Farah – You need to grow up!
By Chuck Adkins
Owner and Publisher
Political Byline – http://politicalbyline.blogspot.com/
The American Nationalist News Service: http://cnationalist.wordpress.com/
It greatly pains me, that I am forced to write an editorial of this nature. Nothing saddens me more to have to publicly rebuke someone, who, not only is a brother in the Lord Jesus Christ, but is someone whom I share similar political and moral values.
In the interest of full disclosure, I am, and will continue to be, an avid reader of WorldNetDaily.com. I do not, and will not, judge an entire organization by the actions of one man. Regardless if that man happens to own said company or not.
However, recent events insist that something be said about the actions of this said person, of whom I hold the highest regard and respect for the profession that he practices.
Yesterday I happened to be over reading Joe’s daily column, where he was asking for advice as to what to do about CAIR smearing him in the press. I, being someone who has been smeared by various people in the past, wrote him a short, but quite courteous e-mail showing my support for Mr. Farah and his work that he does at WorldNetDaily. Here is that E-mail:
Received: by 10.78.166.12 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c3a04f3c0804240230t710acbb8o3868f9512d872893@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:30:31 -0400
From: "Political Byline" <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>
To: (snipped)
Subject: RE: Farah v. CAIR
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_4854_29442941.1209029431405"
Delivered-To: tpblogeditor@gmail.com
------=_Part_4854_29442941.1209029431405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Joe,
I read your site everyday. You're doing the Lord's Work. I wish I could come
to Oregon and Work for you. Anyhow... I would:
1. Sue the living daylights out of CAIR
2. Sue the living daylights out of New York Daily News
Now, I'm currently unemployed, Well, to be honest, I want to be a full time
writer. I do own a few Blogs, Anyhow, I would help money-wise, but I just
don't have it.
Anyhow, I will be praying for you. Don't let the bastards get you down. Keep
your chin up, Keep Jesus close to your heart, and above all, keep fighting!
God Bless,
-Chuck
--
-Chuck Adkins
http://chucksplace.wordpress.com/
http://politicalbyline.blogspot.com/
http://cnationalist.wordpress.com/
http://christpersuit.wordpress.com/
http://cpa313.townhall.com/Default.aspx
A few hours later, I received the following reply from Joseph Farah, Now I won’t be sharing the header information, because as much as Joe angered and disappointed me with his terse response later in this exchange, I will not broadcast his personal information in regards to email address and internet providers. I, unlike some Liberals and some conservatives I know, do have standards. Anyhow, here is the reply I received from Joe Farah:
Give me some more background. We’re developing a new sub-site that is essentially a blog portal. Maybe you can help with it.
Joseph Farah
Editor and CEO
WorldNetDaily.com
Now at this point, I was pretty much bouncing off the walls. Well, not literally, but I was feeling mighty excited at the prospect of writing and whatever else for a website that I read daily, just as a bystander, and so, I replied back with the following, parts of this I will be omitting, but the majority of it, I will be including here.
Anyhow, I sent back my reply:
You want a resume? Here it is:
I sent over my resume, I did not include it here for space considerations. However, I did include it, with some other remarks to Joe. Those remarks were:
Other than that, what else? Been a Christian for 25 years, I’m 35. Single, Never Married, No Kids, I live with my Parents. (How lame is that?) I’ve never made enough to afford to live out on my own. I’m no rock star, but I enjoy writing.
I’ve been Blogging since February of 2007.
I don’t program, as far as Blog design, But I do know my way around WordPress. What I want, is a syndicated column!
I’m a “Right of Center” type, Like an Ann Coulter, but less offensive.
Mind if I ask you a question or two? Newswithviews.com? Are you and that guy friends or something, sites are very similar. You do know, that you could use Worldpress MU (Multi User) for your site, to basically have multi Blogs, for your columns and to create your pages. What do you use now? If I may ask. Reason why I ask about News With Views, he has no RSS feed, which drives me bananas!
If you’d like to chew the fat on the telephone, I’d be more than happy to swap lies and talk about people! *grinning* I can call you, I get free long distance.
I have no day job, in case your wondering… and yes, I have no had a full time, long term job since 2005. If it were not for my parents, I’d be living under an overpass. Basically, without getting into the gore and the bore, I attempted a career change and because of our messed up insurance laws, that are in massive need of reform, I can’t get a job, driving truck, unless I want to live like a hermit and make less than $400.00 a week, for two years… I choose not to do that. too old, when I was 19 I might could have done it, but 35 is a bit old for that sort of life. I like my bed too much.
Anyhow, if you need anything else, let me know…
I would like to get paid for my little talent, that I do have. Which ain’t much, I am a high school drop out, I have A.D.H.D. (and no, it’s not a myth, like Michael Savage says it is….I do take meds…)
anyhow, there you go!
-Chuck
Therefore, there it was, my resume and an off the cuff sales pitch for my service to WorldNetDaily, no harm done, no offensive remarks, or so I thought. Shortly after that, back comes Mr. Farah’s tersely written reply to me:
If you perceive any similarity between WND and NewswithViews, I think you miss the point.
Joseph Farah
Editor and CEO
WorldNetDaily.com
Now did he try to explain what point HE was trying to make? No. He just wrote a very tersely written remark.
I tried, in vain, twice to explain myself, see below:
OK… Well, I didn’t mean to insult you. I hope I didn’t. I wasn’t aware that you were not friendly.
And again:
I was referring more about design and layout, not content… anyhow, hope that wasn’t a sore spot.
Well, seeing I was not going to get reply out of the man, I fired up good old Microsoft Word and wrote Mr. Farah a more formal reply. I expressed my dismay for his lack of professionalism and immaturity towards someone, who, frankly, is somewhat new to the political writing world, heck; I
ha
ve only been doing this since February of 2007. Here is my reply:
Mr. Farah,
When I contacted you and offered my support, I thought I was dealing with a professional person, who, with his experience and maturity, would not mind a question, such as the one that I asked. I am very highly disappointed to know that I was not dealing with mature person, but rather someone who, frankly, needs to grow up.
As to your statement:
“If you perceive any similarity between WND and NewswithViews, I think you miss the point.”
This entire statement, exhibits a very poor attitude sir. Further more, content wise, I do know the difference between WND and NewsWithViews. NewsWithViews deals with non-Mainstream Writers and those whose opinions are not considered within, what is known in the Media and Blogging World, as “Not ready for Primetime.” Alan Stang is a prime example.
However, your publication, I thought, was more of a Mainstream conservative online Publication that prided itself in journalistic integrity, and tended to stay away from the more Conspiracy theory related content.
Now as to your tersely written reply, if I upset you, I apologize, but you should not be so quick to dismiss someone like that, it looks bad on you, as a professional, and as a Christian. I do not make it my business to keep up with who is friendly and who is not, among such publishers.
I trust that I will hear from you again. If not, my life will not end. I will still write, with or without the support of WorldNetDaily.
Take Care and God Bless,
-Chuck Adkins
Owner and Publisher
The American Nationalist News Service
Political Byline
I have not received any reply, nor do I expect to ever hear from him again.
Why am I writing this? Because it needs to be written, Joseph Farah claims to be a Christian. My question is, what Christ does he serve? Does he serve the same Jesus Christ as I do? Does he serve the same Jesus Christ, who by the way, is the Son of the Living God, as Jesus did say the following:
I and my Father are one. (John 10:30 KJV)
Has Joseph Farah ever read the Bible where it says the following?
A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another. (John 13:34-35 KJV)
Has Joseph Farah ever read the following?
Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption. Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice: And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you. (Ephesians 4:29-32 KJV)
It truly does make me wonder, very greatly of the condition of Joe Farah’s heart. I sometimes wonder, is he that eaten up with bitterness, that he was the editor of Sacramento Union and within 15 months he ended up leaving? I am beginning to believe so. I frankly believe that Joe Farah’s god is not Jesus Christ, but rather his business, that being WorldNetDaily. Because why else would someone of Joe’s stature and respect within Conservative Journalism make a terse statement like that?
I will simply end this, with the only thing that I know, that is, the Word of the living God. Joe, if you happen to read this, I published this upon the authority of the Word of God, which says the following:
I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry. (2 Timothy 4:1-5 KJV)
Joe, I am praying for you.
Cross-Posted @ The American Nationalist News Service
Bronze: John McCain over his remarks on 9th ward in New Orleans
Silver: to the idiot Republican who spoke at the national socialist party.
Gold: Bill O’Reilly for flipping his cork over Miley Cyrus’s so-called "risque" photos.
How do you twist a video of you saying the stuff he did? 
This is a real eye opener, it comes via The Republic Broadcasting Network:
John Yoo: The President’s Executioner (via Global Research)
The title of this article – The President’s Executioner – is a play on words. It refers to professor John Yoo, who teaches law at Boalt Hall, University of California, Berkeley. But this man – mild-mannered by all appearances – is not what he seems. He is the man who was, more often than nearly any other, behind the White House decisions to violate the international laws of war. He was the one who told the White House how to get away with committing war crimes. While he may have been a henchman for others who instructed him to make the arguments he did, he repeatedly refused to reverse himself, both while he worked in the Department of Justice and after he left that office and returned to academia.
But it was also during this time period, as we now know, that the Department of Justice became “politicized.” Instead of executing the laws as it should have been doing, the Justice Department became an instrument of President Bush, executing his wishes.
And John Yoo executed White House wishes to twist the law into something it was not and was not meant to be.
Yoo, however, did more than execute orders. The so-called “Torture Memos,” in the writing of which Yoo was an active and primary participant, opened the door to such abuse of the laws that some detainees were actually murdered. For all practical purposes, they were executed, without a trial or guilty verdict.
Thus, the President’s Executioner.
Go read the whole thing, it’s quite the eye opener. 
Cross-Posted @ The American Nationalist News Service
As if Congress didn’t have anything else to do……
There’s this:
Concerned that the military is selling pornography in exchange stores in spite of a ban, one lawmaker has introduced a bill to clean up the matter.
“Our troops should not see their honor sullied so that the moguls behind magazines like Playboy and Penthouse can profit,” said Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., unveiling his House bill April 16.
His Military Honor and Decency Act would amend a provision of the 1997 Defense Authorization Act that banned sales of “sexually explicit material” on military bases.
The new language would “close existing loopholes” in regulations to bring the military “into compliance with the intent of the 1997 law,” Broun said.
“Allowing sale of pornography on military bases has harmed military men and women by escalating the number of violent, sexual crimes, feeding a base addiction, eroding the family as the primary building block of society, and denigrating the moral standing of our troops both here and abroad,” Broun said.
Broun said he wants to bring the Defense Department into compliance with the intent of the 1997 law “so that taxpayers will not be footing the costs of distributing pornography.
Your Tax dollars at work people! 
Others: The Sleuth and Hullabaloo
I am not quite sure what to make of this. It just strikes me is quite odd that the New York Times, who once endorsed Hillary Clinton, would turn right around and scold her.
After all, on January 25, 2008, the New York Times said this:
This generally is the stage of a campaign when Democrats have to work hard to get excited about whichever candidate seems most likely to outlast an uninspiring pack. That is not remotely the case this year.
The early primaries produced two powerful main contenders: Hillary Clinton, the brilliant if at times harsh-sounding senator from New York; and Barack Obama, the incandescent if still undefined senator from Illinois. The remaining long shot, John Edwards, has enlivened the race with his own brand of raw populism.
As Democrats look ahead to the primaries in the biggest states on Feb. 5, The Times’s editorial board strongly recommends that they select Hillary Clinton as their nominee for the 2008 presidential election.
But now this same board of editors, because Hillary Clinton did not play by their expected narrative, they publish this:
The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.
Voters are getting tired of it; it is demeaning the political process; and it does not work. It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election.
If nothing else, self interest should push her in that direction. Mrs. Clinton did not get the big win in Pennsylvania that she needed to challenge the calculus of the Democratic race. It is true that Senator Barack Obama outspent her 2-to-1. But Mrs. Clinton and her advisers should mainly blame themselves, because, as the political operatives say, they went heavily negative and ended up squandering a good part of what was once a 20-point lead.
Is there any clearer proof of bias at The New York Times? At the very least, it shows that the New York Times wants Hillary to follow a pre-written narrative. How childish can a newspaper be! The very idea, that a major newspaper would publish an endorsement and then, because that said candidate does not jump through said hoops that the Newspaper wishes her to, that paper puts out a Editorial blasting her.
I can clearly see now why the Conservatives as a whole are rejecting the New York Times as some Liberal rag, which does not have the Journalistic integrity that it once did. The shoddy work on the John McCain story was living proof of that this just confirms it totally.
Others on this:Washington Wire, protein wisdom, Swampland, Balloon Juice, Hot Air, MSNBC, Real Clear Politics, Buck Naked Politics, Guardian Unlimited, The American Conservative, CANNONFIRE, Salon, Comedy Central, The Huffington Post, Top of the Ticket, No More Mister Nice Blog, The Strata-Sphere, American Street, Connecting.the.Dots, TalkLeft, TPMCafe, Marc Ambinder, Hotline On Call, Daily Kos, Commentary, Philly.com and The Mahablog
