For the record, I do not support this either

As I wrote in a previous posting, that I did not support acts of terrorism to further a political agenda.

Well, I do not support this form of terrorism either. I am sorry, walking around and baiting people into a question, that will cause a predictable reaction, and then following someone with a video camera and berating them is absolutely reprehensible behavior.

As far as I am concerned, Jason Mattera is nothing more than two-bit terrorist thug punk. He should be have been arrested and charged with stalking a federal official. Which is what would have happened, should the D.C. police had actually been doing their jobs; instead of hanging out in the donuts shop.

This is more of that “Stuck on Stupid” stuff that I refer to in my Blog’s sub title.

A little flashback, here is, of all people, Chris Matthews giving this little punk a good dose of his own medicine for not enlisting in the armed forces:

Amazing how those who were cheerleaders for Bush’s war in Iraq….wouldn’t go fight it themselves. 🙄

For the record, No, I do not think this is acceptable

In light of my posting yesterday, that not only succeeded in pissing off some liberals; but also my Mom. I thought I would clear the air on something.

It appears that some people who are not happy with the passage of this Healthcare reform bill, took it upon themselves to conduct some terrorism on the brother of one of the members of the house. It also appears that Bart Supack, received some threatening phone calls.

Here is the video on that story:


Watch CBS News Videos Online

Okay gang, here’s the deal. I do not like this healthcare bill no more than the next “Right of center” blogger. But I want to be perfectly clear. I do not support the idea of conducting terrorism on anyone. The proper definition of terrorism is:

The root word for terrorism is terror and that is defined as: (Source)

Main Entry: ter·ror
Pronunciation: ?ter-?r, ?te-r?r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French terrour, from Latin terror, from terr?re to frighten; akin to Greek trein to be afraid, flee, tremein to tremble — more at tremble
Date: 14th century

1 : a state of intense fear
2 a : one that inspires fear : scourge b : a frightening aspect <the terrors of invasion> c : a cause of anxiety : worry d : an appalling person or thing; especially : brat
3 : reign of terror
4 : violent or destructive acts (as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands <insurrection and revolutionary terror>

I mean, it is one thing to get on a Blog, such as mine here, and hurl insults and verbal flourishes at those that I disagree with on politics. It is another entirely to show up at someone’s house and do something destructive. That my friends is not promoting freedom, Democracy or anything else like that. Committing acts like that, makes you a two-bit thug; and basically no better than those who want to undermine our capitalistic society.

I said this before, and I will say it again; this sort of nonsense right here is why Conservatives, Republicans and Tea Party folks are losing the battle, when it comes to the political conversation in America. It is simply because the American people simply reject extremism in any form. We have a system in this wonderful Country of ours that allows the American people to choose whom they wish to lead their Country, and that is the inalienable right to vote. So, to my follow Americans, Conservatives and Tea Party folks; please, in the name of America —- stop the stupidity already! Committing acts like this makes you no better than those who slammed those planes in the World Trade Center in New York.

My good friends, anarchy never did a thing to promote freedom and peace or birth a Nation. Remember this, we are a civilized society, we are not Palestine, we are not a terrorist nation, We are Americans and we are much more better than that. Please, lets try acting like it.

If we are to win the battle come the 2010 and 2012 elections, we have to stop with this sort of nonsense and get back to the intellectual debate. We have to demonstrate to the American people that we as those who reject socialism are better than the average liberal and not some sort of knuckle-dragging terrorist from the backwoods. Until we can overcome that hurdle and get our own ranks in order, purge ourselves of the extremists. Until this happens, our cause will be a lost one.

Update: On the other hand


18 Myths about Obamacare Debunked by Jane Hamsher

A great round of lies, myths and outright bullshit; which are being touted by the Obama Administration and it’s fan boys.

Via Jane at HuffPo:

Myth 1: This is a universal health care bill.

Fact: The bill is neither universal health care nor universal health insurance. According to the Congressional Budget Office:

  • Total uninsured in 2019 with no bill: 54 million
  • Total uninsured in 2019 with Senate bill: 24 million

Myth 2: Insurance companies hate this bill.

Fact: This bill is almost identical to the plan written by AHIP, the insurance company trade association, in 2009.
The original Senate Finance Committee bill was authored by a former Wellpoint vice president. Since Congress released the first of its health care bills on October 30, 2009, health care stocks have risen 28.35%.

Myth 3: The bill will significantly bring down insurance premiums for most Americans.

Fact: The bill will not bring down premiums significantly, and certainly not the $2,500/year that President Obama promised during his campaign.

Annual premiums in 2016: status quo / with bill:
Small group market, single: $7,800 / $7,800
Small group market, family: $19,3oo / $19,200
Large Group market, single: $7,400 / $7,300
Large group market, family: $21,100 / $21,300
Individual market, single: $5,500 / $5,800
Individual market, family: $13,100 / $15,200

(The cost of premiums in the individual market goes up somewhat due to subsidies and mandates of better coverage. The CBO assumes that cost of individual policies goes down 7-10%, and that people will buy more generous policies.)

Myth 4: The bill will make health care affordable for middle class Americans.

Fact: The bill will impose a financial hardship on middle class Americans who will be forced to buy a product that they can’t afford to use.

A family of four making $66,370 will be forced to pay $5,243 per year for insurance. After basic necessities, this leaves them with $8,307 in discretionary income — out of which they would have to cover clothing, credit card and other debt, child care and education costs, in addition to $5,882 in annual out-of-pocket medical expenses for which families will be responsible.

Myth 5: This plan is similar to the Massachusetts plan, which makes health care affordable.

Fact: Many Massachusetts residents forgo health care because they can’t afford it. A 2009 study by the state of Massachusetts found that:

  • 21% of residents forgo medical treatment because they can’t afford it, including 12% of children
  • 18% have health insurance but can’t afford to use it

Myth 6: This bill provides health care to 31 million people who are currently uninsured.

Fact: This bill will mandate that millions of people who are currently uninsured purchase insurance from private companies, or the IRS will collect up to 2% of their annual income in penalties. Some will be assisted with government subsidies.

Myth 7: You can keep the insurance you have if you like it.

Fact: The excise tax will result in employers switching to plans with higher co-pays and fewer covered services.
Older, less healthy employees with employer-based health care will be forced to pay much more in out-of-pocket expenses than they do now.

Myth 8: The “excise tax” will encourage employers to reduce the scope of health care benefits, and they will pass the savings on to employees in the form of higher wages.

Fact: There is insufficient evidence that employers pass savings from reduced benefits on to employees.

Myth 9: This bill employs nearly every cost control idea available to bring down costs.

Fact: This bill does not bring down costs and leaves out nearly every key cost control measure, including:

  • Public Option ($25-$110 billion)
  • Medicare buy-in
  • Drug re-importation ($19 billion)
  • Medicare drug price negotiation ($300 billion)
  • Shorter pathway to generic biologics ($71 billion)

Myth 10: The bill will require big companies like Wal-Mart to provide insurance for their employees.

Fact: The bill was written so that most Wal-Mart employees will qualify for subsidies, and taxpayers will pick up a large portion of the cost of their coverage.

Myth 11: The bill “bends the cost curve” on health care.

Fact: “Bends the cost curve” is a misleading and trivial claim, as the U.S. would still spend far more for care than other advanced countries.

  • In 2009, health care costs were 17.3% of GDP.
  • Annual cost of health care in 2019, status quo: $4,670.6 billion (20.8% of GDP)
  • Annual cost of health care in 2019, Senate bill: $4,693.5 billion (20.9% of GDP)

Myth 12: The bill will provide immediate access to insurance for Americans who are uninsured because of a pre-existing condition.

Fact: Access to the “high risk pool” is limited and the pool is underfunded. Only those who have been uninsured for more than six months will qualify for the high-risk pool. Only 0.7% of those without insurance now will get coverage, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services report estimates it will run out of funding by 2011 or 2012.

Myth 13: The bill prohibits dropping people in individual plans from coverage when they get sick.

Fact: The bill does not empower a regulatory body to keep people from being dropped when they’re sick. There are already many states that have laws on the books prohibiting people from being dropped when they’re sick, but without an enforcement mechanism, there is little to hold the insurance companies in check.

Myth 14: The bill ensures consumers have access to an effective internal and external appeals process to challenge new insurance plan decisions.

Fact: The “internal appeals process” is in the hands of the insurance companies themselves, and the “external” one is up to each state.

Ensuring that consumers have access to “internal appeals” simply means the insurance companies have to review their own decisions. And it is the responsibility of each state to provide an “external appeals process,” as there is neither funding nor a regulatory mechanism for enforcement at the federal level.

Myth 15: This bill will stop insurance companies from hiking rates 30%-40% per year.

Fact: This bill does not limit insurance company rate hikes. Private insurers continue to be exempt from anti-trust laws, and are free to raise rates without fear of competition in many areas of the country.

Myth 16: When the bill passes, people will begin receiving benefits under this bill immediately

Fact: Most provisions in this bill, such as an end to the ban on pre-existing conditions for adults, do not take effect until 2014.

Six months from the date of passage, children could not be excluded from coverage due to pre-existing conditions, though insurance companies could charge more to cover them. Children would also be allowed to stay on their parents’ plans until age 26. There will be an elimination of lifetime coverage limits, a high risk pool for those who have been uninsured for more than 6 months, and community health centers will start receiving money.

Myth 17: The bill creates a pathway for single payer.

Fact: Bernie Sanders’ provision in the Senate bill does not start until 2017, and does not cover the Department of Labor, so no, it doesn’t create a pathway for single payer.

Obama told Dennis Kucinich that the Ohio Representative’s amendment is similar to Bernie Sanders’ provision in the Senate bill, and creates a pathway to single payer. Since the waiver does not start until 2017, and does not cover the Department of Labor, it is nearly impossible to see how it gets around the ERISA laws that stand in the way of any practical state single payer system.

Myth 18: The bill will end medical bankruptcy and provide all Americans with peace of mind.

Fact: Most people with medical bankruptcies already have insurance, and out-of-pocket expenses will continue to be a burden on the middle class.

  • In 2009, 1.5 million Americans declared bankruptcy
  • Of those, 62% were medically related
  • Three-quarters of those had health insurance
  • The Obama bill leaves 24 million without insurance
  • The maximum yearly out-of-pocket limit for a family will be $11,900 (PDF) on top of premiums
  • A family with serious medical problems that last for a few years could easily be financially crushed by medical costs
  • I have to hand it to Jane; she is not afraid to stand up to her own party and call them out on their lies.I do not agree with Jane’s politics, nor her desire to get a public option or single payer healthcare, but there is something to be said about gal, who dares to take on the liberal establishment and call them out on their deception. Hats off to ya Jane and keep up the good work on your end of the aisle.

    I just wish Jane would wake up and realize that the Democratic Party is not the Party of the people that it once was; but is now a party of big Government socialism. in other words, the Party of Roosevelt and World War 2 is gone for good and is now an outright Marxist Party. I pray one day that she see’s that. I figured that out, when I began blogging. I hope one day, that she too does someday see that.

    Needless to say, this healthcare bill is NOT going to be like Christmas….for anybody.

    Obama Signs his Healthcare plan into law

    Yeah, I know; most of you most likely do not care to watch ol’ Bambi here pat himself on the back. But, it is a historic moment. So, here it is….

    The very odd part comes at the end.

    The Video:

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    The Story via MSNBC:

    President Barack Obama on Tuesday signed into law a landmark health care reform bill, presiding over the biggest shift in U.S. domestic policy since the 1960s and capping a divisive, yearlong debate that could define the November congressional elections.

    The law will bring near-universal coverage to a wealthy country in which tens of millions of people are uninsured. The plan’s provisions will be phased in over four years, and it is expected to expand coverage to about 94 percent of eligible non-elderly Americans would have coverage, compared with 83 percent today.

    “We have now just enshrined the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health,” Obama said at a signing ceremony at the White House, where he was joined by House and Senate Democrats who backed the bill as well as ordinary Americans whose health care struggles have touched the president.

    Again, I present this, because it is a historic event. Although, I just wonder what will come in 2010 and 2012.

    Should be interesting to watch.

    Video: Is the Stimulus Working?

    This comes via R.S. McCain:

    Stupidity from the moderation cue

    Here’s a classic example of what will get your IP address banned from commenting here, and your info published:

    The first comment was not so bad:

    New comment on your post #17599 “Dana Loesch lays the smack down on the idiotic accusations on racism and gay slurs “
    Author : Scott (IP: 66.235.49.173 , c-66-235-49-173.sea.wa.customer.broadstripe.net)
    E-mail : surgery@usa.net
    URL    :
    Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=66.235.49.173
    Comment:
    That video doesn’t prove sh*t.  It fails to show anyone shouting anything vile, but so what?  If you’re in that crowd, videoing with your cam or cell phone, and you happened to have footage of the actual incident, are you going to release it?  No friggin way.  Anybody standing in that crowd is a right wing true-believer and would keep such video under wraps forever.
    The evidence, such as it is, is firmly on the side of the accusations being true.  There were several witnesses who had nothing to gain by supporting a lie, and they all backed it up.  Game over.

    The language was a bit tough, but he did have a point; so, I thought I’d let it stand. Then, he got personal.

    Author : Scott (IP: 66.235.49.173 , c-66-235-49-173.sea.wa.customer.broadstripe.net)
    E-mail : surgery@usa.net
    URL    :
    Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=66.235.49.173
    Comment:
    Here’s proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT6PNv2GhY4

    By the way, I disagree with your point…saying anything other than “there are no circumstnaces under which those remarks are appropriate, I denounce the use of those terms, and the attitudes they represent” is being a total pussy. I mean YOU.  What are you, OK with the KKK burning crosses in your neighbors yards?  Feel like you Don’t have to do what a black cop tells you?  Nunes is worse, but what do you expect from politicians, who are all snakes, Rep or Dem?

    I’d have gone even farther in Nunes’ shoes, and said, “Furthermore, the people who screamed those epithets are not in the same camp as me, they are not patriotic citizens of this great nation, they are not fit to be Republicans or for that matter Democrats either.  Those people need to go home, and perhaps form their own political party, I hear David Dukes is looking for a job and could be their leader.  They should buy an island and start their own country, because they are not welcome in Washington DC, nor anyplace else in the United States of America.  In fact, if they did start an island nation under the banner of racism, we should nuke it.”

    Yours

    Scott

    So, instead of trying to make a point. He insulted me. That goes against the rules and I basically told him to hit the road, and things went down hill in e-mail, and here they are:

    Forwarded conversation
    Subject:
    two words
    ————————

    From: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 PM
    To: surgery@usa.net


    fuck off, don’t come to my fucking blog and expect your insults to be approved.

    Goodbye.

    -Patrick
    http://www.politicalbyline.com

    ———-

    From: Scott <Surgery@usa.net>
    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:16 PM
    To: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>

    Pussy.  Afraid of someone with an opinion?

    Can’t listen to facts that don’t support your argument.  Typical.
    ———-
    From: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:17 PM
    To: Scott <Surgery@usa.net>

    Like I said asshole, fuck you. You wanna insult someone, do it
    elsewhere. Your bullshit ain’t fucking wanted…


    and I will be blocking the IP.

    I have rules. follow ’em or get the fuck on…

    ———-
    From: Scott <Surgery@usa.net>
    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:29 PM
    To: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>

    Rules?  Are they posted somewhere?  I’m happy to edit my post to accomodate them.  Unless the little boy is afraid to hear an opposing point of view?  Do I hear your mommy calling?
    ———-

    – Show quoted text –
    From: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:32 PM

    To: Scott <Surgery@usa.net>


    Nah, I don’t want you here. Your attitude sucks. Don’t need it.

    For the record, it is here:

    http://www.politicalbyline.com/comment-policy/

    But, see you’ve got this idiotic attitude. I choose to not allow you to comment.

    See ya.

    ———-
    From: Scott Welker <hypocrophobe@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:47 PM


    Waaaaaah!  Im afraid! Mommy, Scott doesn’t agree with me

    From Scott

    ———-

    From: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:49 PM
    To: Scott Welker <hypocrophobe@gmail.com>

    Congrads, you just got yourself published on my blog. Including your
    e-mail address and your IP address as well. I will be including your
    e-mails to me.
    ———-
    My rules around here are simple. You are free to comment; but you are not free to insult me. My Blog, my rules; follow ’em or hit the road. Congrats Scott now everyone knows your IP. Idiot.