Dems platform change on Abortion could cost them votes from Anti-abortion Democrats

This could be bad for Hillary and the Democrats:

A Democratic Party proposal to amend the party’s platform to include more progressive language around abortion rights has outraged Democrats who oppose abortion, with some saying the issue has cost Hillary Clinton their votes.

The fallout centers around a proposal to repeal long-standing legislation that limits federal funds for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest or life-threatening pregnancies — the so-called Hyde Amendment. Some version of this ban has been included in annual federal spending bills since the late 1970s.

The draft platform says Democrats “will continue to stand up to Republican efforts to defund Planned Parenthood health centers” and “will continue to oppose — and seek to overturn — federal and state laws and policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde Amendment.”

Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life, said the progressive language on the platform is making the party smaller. “This platform’s language just says (to abortion opponents) you are no longer welcome,” she said. “This has been the general message pro-life Democrats are receiving across the country.”

Day said ever since the Democratic National Committee released its 2016 platform draft July 1, she has gotten calls from Democrats that oppose abortion and say the language is keeping them from voting for Clinton.

Carol Crossed, 72, a retired elementary school professor from Rochester, N.Y., is one of those Democrats.“

They are pro-choice because they don’t want to be infringing their opinion on others,” she said. “Now their platform says if you don’t like abortions, too bad — you are going to pay for it anyway.”  – Source: USA Today Anti-abortion Dems outraged by platform change

You have to understand something here; not all Democrats are pro-choice. There are some Christians, who are very devout to their Church. But, because of their background, they are committed Democrats. I know, I used to be one of those kind of people. So, I see where these people are coming from. I mean, these people are put into a very tough position; they are horrified by what the Republican Party is running for President. But, that the same time, they are also horrified at what the Democrats are doing with abortion.

This is what happens, when a political party goes very far to the left, of what it was founded as. The Democratic Party was not founded as a “Progressive Party” in the modern day sense. It was founded as a populist alternative to the Republican Party of old; which favored the businesses tycoons of old.

Needless to say, both political parties have changed greatly as whole. The Republican Party now has many factions; you have the movement grassroots faction, you have the elitist faction; it is a sight to behold. The Democrats, on the other hand; have become this “progressive socialist” party, that seems to be anti-white, anti-police and it is, quite frankly, unnerving to people like myself, who have a keen sense of history to watch a political party like that shift that far to the left.

The Democratic Party and it’s followers, have embraced a strain of progressivism that is intolerance of dissenting views and wishes to prosecute anyone who dares to disagree with them; either by discrediting them or by violence. This is nothing more than left-wing fascism. It is the hallmark traits of communism. I have always said, since about 2007; that the distance between the Democratic Party and the Communist Party and Communist themselves, used to be the width of the Grand Canyon. Now, with the infiltration of the progressive socialists in that political party; that distance is more like a small city block.

 

David Duke for Congress?!?! Good Luck with that!

The stupidity of this below boggles the mind. 🙄

David Duke says he is getting ready to run for Congress.The former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and ex-candidate for Louisiana governor told The Daily Beast he is heavily leaning towards challenging Rep. Steve Scalise. Scalise is the No. 3 Republican in the House who reportedly once called himself “David Duke without the baggage” and spoke at a white nationalist group that Duke founded.“I’ve very seriously set up an exploratory committee to run for the United States Congress against Steve Scalise,” Duke said. “I expect to make a decision in a few days” ahead of the July 22 ballot deadline.Duke said the killing of five white police officers in Dallas by a black militant pushed him to the brink of running.“I don’t take any satisfaction in the fact that I was right, but I have been right,” he said. “Unless European Americans stand up, they are going to lose everything they care about in this country.”Duke sees 2016 as his year to win because of new racial tensions.“There are millions of people across the country who would like to have me in the Congress. I’d be the only person in Congress openly defending the rights and the heritage of European Americans,” he said. “We are on the offensive today. There’s no more defenses.” Via: David Duke Plans to Run for Congress Against the Republican Who Spoke to His Group – The Daily Beast

Quite bluntly, this guy has as much chance of getting elected, than I do getting elected President of the United States of America. 😆

Oh, and the stupidity continues:

Aware of his checkered history, Duke said he welcomed the backlash that would come if he runs.

“We have social media and the Internet today puts me at an even footing with you. The truth is going to get out one way or the other. I demand some fair treatment. The media can demonize me all they want. They can lie about me. They can say whatever they want about me. Things are changing in this country,” Duke said, his voice rising to a crescendo.

“We’re in a revolutionary spirit.”

In other words, he is running to put this name in the media, so he can get more hits on his website and maybe, possibly, sell a book or two. What some people will not do to pimp themselves out for a few sheckles.

Because let’s just be real folks; this guy is not only going to face a very stiff headwind from the left; but also from the right as well and yes, that does include the Republican Party. If you think that the Republican establishment is going to let this guy even remotely win; you are very highly mistaken.

Donald Trump may have blown a few doors open in the Republican Party; but this here, is definitely not one of them. The Republican Party has been burned in the past, by many a professional bigot, if there is such a thing — and they are not going to be burned again.

Besides all of that; has David Duke forgotten exactly what group of people basically runs that political party? I think he is making a very big mistake; that will set his cause back many, many years. Basically, he is the white equivalent of black lives matter; a movement that is about to be shoved to the dust bins of history, as a violent extremist group.

White people need a voice, but not his, not at all. 😡

….and before anyone calls me a “N*gger lover” or a Jew. Take a look at my profile page and tell me what I am, thanks.

 

Good job old man

You know, there’s a lot of things that happened between me and this blogger that I’m about to link to a couple of years back; and I must admit I wasn’t too happy about how all that went down.

Many things can be said about him, none of which I’m not going to print here; because personally I don’t know the man’s heart at all.

But, there is one thing you can not say about him at all — And that’s that he does not have his family life, down to an exact science. Because in my book any man who steps up to the plate and takes on the challenge of fatherhood and decides to build a family; is a bigger man, than any pop star, baseball player, movie star, rock and roll musician or anything like that.

Mr. McCain you’ve done one hell of a good job and I God bless you for it. 🙂

I just wish things between you and me had worked out on better terms than what they did and I wish we would have been able to meet each other before the neocons got involved.

Deadly shooting in Dallas, 11 Police officers shot, 1 Civilian hit, 4 dead

My commentary:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NcEmOV37DM?rel=0

The Headlines:

CNN: Shots reported fired at Dallas protest over police killings

Annie Potasznik / CBS Dallas: Dallas Police: Snipers Shoot 11 Officers, 4 Dead

Tegna / WFAA-TV: At least 10 officers shot, 3 dead after attack at Dallas protest

David Caplan / ABC News:11 Cops Shot, 4 Dead in Dallas: Suspect in Custody

Via Drudge:

BLACK LIVES KILL
4 COPS SHOT DEAD IN DALLAS
CITY IN SHOCK

The roundup: Dallas Morning News, Fox News, Mother Jones, WPMT FOX43, KXAN-TV, Business Insider, Jezebel, Hit & Run, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, Scared Monkeys, NPR, CBS San Francisco, ABC News, Patterico’s Pontifications, The Atlantic, ACS Blog, Complex, New York’s PIX11, Gothamist, CBS New York, WTKR-TV, Boing Boing, Vox, WDEF-TV, CNNMoney, NBC News, WREG-TV, USA TODAY College, KRON4.com, Bearing Arms, alan.com, FOX6Now.com and KIMT-TV, more at Mediagazer », RedState, JustOneMinute, NBC News, WRIC-TV, The Week, CBS New York, Associated Press, WDTN-TV, WDEF-TV, Balloon Juice, WREG-TV and KFOR-TV, The Week, Associated Press, WAVY-TV, WQAD-TV, WTVR-TV, Business Insider, The Week, The Daily Caller, KRON4.com, FOX6Now.com and WSPA-TV

 

 

Video: On the shooting of Philando Castile

Wow, two in a row. First Baton Rouge and now this.

This one though, is a bit different; Baton Rouge was a person resisting arrest. This one is a over-zealous police officer, who very much overreacted. 🙁

See the reports here, here, here, here, here and here’s the video on facebook, if you care to watch it, it is quite graphic, so be warned.

Also too, EVERYONE AND I MEAN EVERYONE should read This column here over at The Federalist. It is truly very good.

Here is my video commentary on it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodWiaMg3CA?rel=0

Other sites:  ThinkProgress, TechCrunch, New York Daily News, Business Insider, The Federalist, Hit & Run, BuzzFeed, Jezebel, BizPac Review, CBS Dallas, The Root, Daily Kos, New York Post, Mother Jones, alan.com, WDEF-TV, The Week and garnetnews.com, Los Angeles Times, Rewire, The Root, The Atlantic, Media Matters for America and The Daily Caller, Slate, National Review, Hit & Run, Media Matters for America, FEE, Business Insider, Vox, Hot Air, FOX31 Denver, WCCO | CBS Minnesota, Gothamist and Shakesville, NBC News, Bearing Arms, AOL, WCCO | CBS Minnesota, KTLA, alan.com, ThinkProgress, Business Insider, KIMT-TV, ABC News, WDEF-TV, Associated Press and Bleacher Report, Washington Post, Vox, The Atlantic, New York Times, The Moderate Voice, FOX31 Denver, WQAD-TV, Business Insider, VICE, Fox 59, No More Mister Nice Blog, The Last Refuge and New York’s PIX11, The Atlantic, Power Line, Raw Story, Washington Monthly, The Nation, WCCO | CBS Minnesota, Joe.My.God., Common Dreams, BillMoyers.com, Hullabaloo and Mashable

Video: On the shooting death of Alton Sterling by Baton Rouge police

There has been another officer involved shooting, involving two white officers and a black man.

See the story here, here, here, and here.

My commentary on this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz8S2eI4GMo?rel=0

Other Blogs and Websites: Breitbart, CNN, Vox, Raw Story, New York Daily News, MSNewsNow.com, NBC News, Washington Post, USA Today, Mother Jones, Mediaite, In Flex We Trust, New York Magazine, Complex, Daily Wire, CityLab, NPR, LawNewz, Daily Kos, The Root, New Orleans Times-Picayune, The Huffington Post, Heavy.com, ThinkProgress, Politico, Associated Press, Jezebel, ABC News, Balloon Juice, The Atlantic, Bearing Arms, The Moderate Voice, Mashable, Hit & Run and BillMoyers.com, Vox, Business Insider, Bearing Arms, CNN, Mediaite and Hot Air, CNN, OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING …, Heavy.com, New York Daily News, The Burning Platform, CBS New York, Common Dreams, Mashable, Vox, The Root, Raw Story, Associated Press, AOL, Mother Jones, Hot Air, VICE, ThinkProgress, Daily Kos, Shakesville and FOX2now.com, ABC News, Fox News, Al Jazeera English, Jezebel, The Daily Caller, Media Matters for America, www.wnyc.org, Lawyers, Guns & Money, Guardian, DCist and The Week

Sarah Palin’s speech for Trump invokes memories of George W. Bush era

Apparently Sarah Palin gave a speech in support of Donald Trump. You can go watch that video here.

The things said, in that video, quite frankly, remind me of another era in conservative politics and national politics in general.

Jazz Shaw, over at Hotair.com gives the low-down:

Skip to 11:32 for the key bit from today’s speech in Denver. “They’re not all bad,” she says of right-wing anti-Trumpers. “I’m kidding. They are.” I don’t mind the insults as much as I do the fact they still come paired with appeals for unity, as though calling someone a traitor enough times might someday finally open their minds to Trump’s divine greatness. “We don’t need you treacherous #NeverTrump dirtbags” is a coherent approach. That’s a kiss-off. “We need you and we’re pleading with you as patriots to help us stop Hillary” is another. That’s earnest outreach. “We need you treacherous #NeverTrump dirtbags” is a co-dependent ex-boyfriend/girlfriend clinging to your ankle while sobbing. It won’t work. The same goes for any anti-Trumpers who, after spending the past year deriding Trump fans, would suddenly insist that they get with the program and back a new nominee if Trump were deposed at the convention. We’re a party stuck in a broken marriage whose two spouses despise each other but who can’t bring themselves to divorce. The path to reconciliation probably doesn’t involve cutesy-poo “RAT” acronyms, I’m thinking, just as it doesn’t involve “You’re either with us or you’re against us” ultimatums. If we’re going to do that, let’s give up on reconciliation, no?

Please, keep in mind that HotAir.com is decidedly anti-trump; and I really do NOT agree with them on Trump at all. However, there are some things in this speech that bother me greatly.

The whole idea of, “You are either with us or against us.” is troubling for a good many reasons. I am old enough and have been around politics enough to remember the George W. Bush-era. I have also been around long enough to remember that during the lead up to the war in Iraq, which most on the right concede, was a tragic mistake, that caused more problems than it solved; the attitude among those who were loyal Bush supporters, was “You are either with us or against us.”

This mentality is dangerous, it is fascist and it is wrong. The idea that someone who disagrees with those who support Donald Trump is some sort of enemy; smacks of the George W. Bush Iraq War era. When dissent was labeled treasonous.

Please, do not misunderstand me at all. I happen to believe that Donald Trump will make a wonderful President. I believe he will stand up to the globalists and balance out our trade deals in our favor. I believe that Trump will straighten out our illegal immigration problem. I believe that he will strengthen our Military and put America on an “America First” foreign policy course.

But I’ll be damned, if I will be labeled a “rat” or a “traitor”; If I happen to disagree with something that he says or does! 😡

If Sarah Palin thinks that making speeches like this, is doing anything to help Donald Trump’s cause; she is very, very, highly mistaken. Donald Trump is not perfect, he is not a king. He is not a Messiah of any sort at all. Donald Trump is running for the highest office in United States politics and that is the President of the United States of America.

I am glad to see that Sarah Palin and many other conservatives are rally behind Trump. But, the use of these sort of statements towards those who do not support Trump; are very off-putting to people like me, who happen to remember when the Republicans lost their ever-loving minds back in 2003-2004.

 

Photo of the day

One of the many Freight ships that go down the Detroit River

This is one of the many occasions, when I actually get out of the house go down by the river and enjoy some coffee from Tim Hortons. 

I captured this picture, I thought you might enjoy it

Reply to John’s E-Mail

The Video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlAWAPJbfyY?rel=0

Today, I received an email from a “John” asking the following:

Hello Fellow Christian,
My name is John and I have a mom who is a confessing Christian who loves to talk about the lord and give advice but she is in adultery. Me and my wife brought up the scriptures to her and pray daily but nothing. I felt moved to talk with you because I was reading one of your blogs on Pastor Charles Stanley who y mom attends his church. My question is, should we continue to keep her in our lives or cut her off? We have children and I do not want this to have an affect on their Christian life. Anything will be great. Thank You.

Now, I sent the man a reply and the email address bounced; so, I will post the reply here:

Hi John,

That’s a tough call.

First off, I would talk to YOUR Pastor and ask HIM for guidance.

Now, personally, I think that totally cutting your children off from their grandmother, is not a good idea. I would however, limit their interaction and time spent with her; and I would be always there to supervise visits.

Now, you can totally cut her off, after all the Bible does say:

Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. – (2 Corinthians 6:14-18 KJV)

and…:

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery – (Matthew 5:27-32 KJV)

And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. And if thy foot offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter halt into life, than having two feet to be cast into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. – (Mark 9:43-48 KJV)
and:

Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven. Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. – (Matthew 10:32-38 KJV)

—————-

Now, here is the harsh, brutally honest, cold dish rag in the face, honest truth — advice that I will give you:

If you wish to take the hard stance and stand for what you know to be right and decide to separate yourself from those, that you know to be committing sin; you had better be very prepared to deal with the fallout or consequences. No man or woman, who has decided to take harsh stance and decided to cut off all communication, fellowship and interaction like this; has had it easy. In fact, it can cause you many, many, headaches.

Now, I am not saying that you should not do it. You just should be very prepared for what the fallout might be.

I will be praying for you, that the Lord would give you Godly wisdom in this situation

I hope sees this reply. 🙂