I got a kick out of this:
Heh… too funny. At least McCain has a sense of humor. 😆
More than one can say about B. Hussein “lay off my wife!” Obama
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Celebrity, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, Humor, John McCain, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, McCain, Media, Neo-Conservatives, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Washington DC, White House
A good Saturday afternoon to you all. 😀
The big news cycle today is Obamassiah is on his overseas PhotoOp Trip, and already there is a story out that the Iraqi P.M. is supposedly supporting Obama’s Plan of retreat and defeat.
Actually, this is what is going to happen in Iraq, regardless of what that turban-headed idiot thinks, or his people.
Video:
If you would like to look at the left, wetting themselves over a story, which is most likely been distorted, please feel free to click here.
….and that’s your Saturday non-headline of the day! 😉
Technorati Tags: 9/11, Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Blogs, Bush, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, Iraq, John McCain, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, Neo-Conservatives, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Stupidity, Support Our Troops, Terrorism, War, War on Terrorism, White House, World News, constitution party
Another McCain distraction, under the bus!
“It is clear to me that Democrats want to attack me rather than debate Sen. McCain on important economic issues facing the country,” the former Texas senator said in statement. “That kind of distraction hurts not only Sen. McCain’s ability to present concrete programs to deal with the country’s problems, it hurts the country. To end this distraction and get on with the real debate, I hereby step down as co-chair of the McCain Campaign and join the growing number of rank-and-file McCain supporters.” – Washington Wire – WSJ.com : Sen. Gramm Leaves McCain Camp
Good riddance. I’ll admit it, his asinine comments even offended me, and I’m a Conservative.
Of course, this is not good enough for the Obamassiah:
“The question for John McCain isn’t whether Phil Gramm will continue as chairman of his campaign, but whether he will continue to keep the economic plan that Gramm authored and that represents a continuation of the polices that have failed American families for the last eight years,” said Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan.
Whether that happens or not is any man’s guess. If his recent campaign is any indication, nothing will change. His appointment of a Open Border advocate, being one of the many things wrong with McCain’s campaign.
Technorati Tags: Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, John McCain, Liberal, Liberals, Neo-Conservatives, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Stupidity, Washington DC, White House, vote, voting
Oy….
John McCain on Thursday described Barack Obama’s Senate record as “more to the left” than Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont — an independent who caucuses with Democrats but has described himself as an “independent Democratic socialist.”
During his town hall meeting with voters in Kansas City yesterday, McCain said, “Senator Obama has the most extreme record of any member of the United States Senate.”
In an interview after the event, The Kansas City Star asked him to clarify the remark.
“His voting record … is more to the left than the announced socialist in the United States Senate, Bernie Sanders of Vermont,” McCain answered, according the paper.
Asked if he thought Obama was a socialist, McCain answered: “I don’t know. All I know is his voting record, and that’s what people usually judge their elected representatives by.”
No wonder the Democrats and Liberals think he’s a dolt! 🙄
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, John McCain, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, McCain, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Stupidity, Washington DC, White House, vote, voting
Finally, Some good news from Iraq.
Quote:
In the area of security cooperation, the President and the Prime Minister agreed that improving conditions should allow for the agreements now under negotiation to include a general time horizon for meeting aspirational goals — such as the resumption of Iraqi security control in their cities and provinces and the further reduction of U.S. combat forces from Iraq. The President and Prime Minister agreed that the goals would be based on continued improving conditions on the ground and not an arbitrary date for withdrawal. The two leaders welcomed in this regard the return of the final surge brigade to the United States this month, and the ongoing transition from a primary combat role for U.S. forces to an overwatch role, which focuses on training and advising Iraqi forces, and conducting counter-terror operations in support of those forces. – Statement by the Press Secretary on Iraq (Via The White House’s Official Website)
Of course, the Communist Liberals, who are on a crusade of defeat in Iraq, want firm timetables and when we reach them, they can say, “Okay times up!”, so they can have their little Commie Liberal Vietnam moment.
I have to give Jack Moss credit, he is right here:
It’s not a “concession”, but what the President had been saying all
along, that when the Iraqis are ready and want us to go we will go.
I agree with you 100%, Jack. Only reason this discussion of timetables ever started is because of the defeatist commie liberals want us to not complete the job we started and not fix what we broke. They, that being the Anti-American, Troop Hating commie Liberals here in America. Time tables, glad we didn’t do that during World War 2, or we’d be under German or Japanese rule today.
Do you need anymore proof, that Liberals hate America?
Technorati Tags: Afghanistan, America, Barack Obama, Christanity, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, Fitna, Freedom of Speech, Government, History, Iran, Iraq, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, Media, Military, Neo-Conservatives, News, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Support Our Troops, Terrorism, War, War on Terrorism, White House, World News, constitution party
Obama has been exposed……again….
Quote:
Barack Obama wants to speak at the Brandenburg Gate. He figures it would be a nice backdrop. The supporting cast — a cheering audience and a few fainting frauleins — would be a picturesque way to bolster his foreign policy credentials.
What Obama does not seem to understand is that the Brandenburg Gate is something you earn. President Ronald Reagan earned the right to speak there because his relentless pressure had brought the Soviet empire to its knees and he was demanding its final “tear down this wall” liquidation. When President John F. Kennedy visited the Brandenburg Gate on the day of his “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech, he was representing a country that was prepared to go to the brink of nuclear war to defend West Berlin.
[…]
Obama is a three-year senator without a single important legislative achievement to his name, a former Illinois state senator who voted “present” nearly 130 times. As president of the Harvard Law Review, as law professor and as legislator, has he ever produced a single notable piece of scholarship? Written a single memorable article? His most memorable work is a biography of his favorite subject: himself.
It is a subject upon which he can dilate effortlessly. In his victory speech upon winning the nomination, Obama declared it a great turning point in history — “generations from now we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment” — when, among other wonders, “the rise of the oceans began to slow.” As Hudson Institute economist Irwin Stelzer noted in his London Daily Telegraph column, “Moses made the waters recede, but he had help.” Obama apparently works alone.
[…]
After all, in the words of his own slogan, “we are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” which, translating the royal “we,” means: ” I am the one we’ve been waiting for.” Amazingly, he had a quasi-presidential seal with its own Latin inscription affixed to his lectern, until general ridicule — it was pointed out that he was not yet president — induced him to take it down.
He lectures us that instead of worrying about immigrants learning English, “you need to make sure your child can speak Spanish” — a language Obama does not speak. He further admonishes us on how “embarrassing” it is that Europeans are multilingual but “we go over to Europe, and all we can say is ‘merci beaucoup.’ ” Obama speaks no French.
[….]
We are getting to know. Redeemer of our uninvolved, uninformed lives. Lord of the seas. And more. As he said on victory night, his rise marks the moment when “our planet began to heal.” As I recall — I’m no expert on this — Jesus practiced his healing just on the sick. Obama operates on a larger canvas. The Audacity of Vanity by Charles Krauthammer – (Via washingtonpost.com)
Krauthammer couldn’t be more right. Obama is playing this little game, of him being the second coming of John F. Kennedy. The truth is, B. Hussein Obama could not hold candle to JFK at all. Kennedy came from a grand royal line of political family, even if they were all commie liberals. Obama is a bastard son of a bi-racial marriage, and I use that term quite loosely.
Obama has no more earned the right to speak that the Berlin wall, than I have.
I just wonder, will he go, representing this man or will we hear this at the Berlin wall??:
It is to wonder.
Others Blogging: The Huffington Post, Wake up America, Commentary, Macsmind, Hot Air, Obsidian Wings, The Confluence, Firedoglake, Sister Toldjah, alicublog, No More Mister Nice Blog, Ed Driscoll.com, JustOneMinute, Pirate’s Cove, Soccer Dad, and more via Memeorandum
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, First Admendment, Freedom of Speech, History, Identity Politics, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Race Baiting, Republican, Republicans, Stupidity, Washington DC, White House, World News, constitution party
Larry Hunter has decided that Obama is the answer for America.
Who is Larry Hunter?
Quote:
I’m a lifelong Republican – a supply-side conservative. I worked in the Reagan White House. I was the chief economist at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for five years. In 1994, I helped write the Republican Contract with America. I served on Bob Dole’s presidential campaign team and was chief economist for Jack Kemp’s Empower America.
This November, I’m voting for Barack Obama.
So, why is Larry supporting Obama?
Quote:
The answer is simple: Unjustified war and unconstitutional abridgment of individual rights vs. ill-conceived tax and economic policies – this is the difference between venial and mortal sins.
Taxes, economic policy and health care reform matter, of course. But how we extract ourselves from the bloody boondoggle in Iraq, how we avoid getting into a war with Iran and how we preserve our individual rights while dealing with real foreign threats – these are of greater importance.
He does not mince words about Juan McSame either:
Quote:
John McCain would continue the Bush administration’s commitment to interventionism and constitutional overreach. Obama promises a humbler engagement with our allies, while promising retaliation against any enemy who dares attack us. That’s what conservatism used to mean – and it’s what George W. Bush promised as a candidate.
So, why is this man throwing his Conservative principles into the wind and voting for Obama?
Quote:
“But here’s the thing: Even if my hopes on domestic policy are dashed and Obama reveals himself as an unreconstructed, dyed-in-the-wool, big-government liberal, I’m still voting for him.
These past eight years, we have spent over a trillion dollars on foreign soil – and lost countless lives – and done what I consider irreparable damage to our Constitution.
If economic damage from well-intentioned but misbegotten Obama economic schemes is the ransom we must pay him to clean up this foreign policy mess, then so be it. It’s not nearly as costly as enduring four more years of what we suffered the last eight years.”
I hate to admit it, but I agree with him. I believe that the Republican Party needs to be punished, harshly, for it’s allowing of a Neo-Conservative, Big Government, Pro-War, Agenda to overtake it. The Republican Party needs to take the next 7 years to rewrite the party’s entire message.
Others: PoliBlog (TM), NewsBusters.org, The Impolitic, Eunomia,Balloon Juice, American Spectator,
Technorati Tags: 9/11, Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Conservative, Corruption, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, Government, Iran, Iraq, John McCain, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, Neo-Conservatives, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Stupidity, Support Our Troops, Terrorism, War, War on Terrorism, Washington DC, White Hous
A Republican Presidential candidate’s campaign accuses a Democrat running against him of being just as bad as the current Republican President.
The McCain campaign is taking their effort to distance their
candidate from the unpopular President Bush to a whole new level:
McCain’s advisers are now openly attacking Bush on Iraq — and not only
that, they’re also saying that Barack Obama is the one who is like Bush on the war!On a conference call just now with reporters, McCain foreign policy
adviser Randy Scheunemann compared Barack Obama’s insistence on a
timetable for withdrawal from Iraq to Bush’s insistence that we were
winning even as things went badly for years.“I think the American people have had enough of inflexibility and
stubbornness in national security policy,” Scheunemann said. When asked
later by the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein whether the campaign was
disparaging President Bush, Scheunemann dug in: “We cannot afford to
replace one administration that refused for too long to acknowledge
failure in Iraq with a candidate that refuses to acknowledge success in
Iraq.”Forget “McSame.” The candidate who would really continue Bush’s policies is “BushBama.”
Wow…. 😮 😯 Talk about spinning like a top. I have a very bad feeling this is going to backfire on McCain in a really big hurry.
Anyone who thinks that Barack Obama is anything remotely similar than Bush, quite frankly, has got a screw loose.
Others on this:
Talking Points Memo, The Carpetbagger Report, Wonkette and Angry Bear
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Bush, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, Government, Iraq, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, Neo-Conservatives, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Stupidity, War, War on Terrorism, White House
(H/T and Thanks to Senate Conservatives)
Tell everyone you know about this video. It is important that everyone know, how the Democrats are lying about ANWR.
When the message is not fitting the current events, what do you do? Edit your website.
The New York Daily News reports:
Barack Obama’s campaign scrubbed his presidential Web site over the weekend to remove criticism of the U.S. troop “surge” in Iraq, the Daily News has learned.
The presumed Democratic nominee replaced his Iraq issue Web page, which had described the surge as a “problem” that had barely reduced violence.
“The surge is not working,” Obama’s old plan stated, citing a lack of Iraqi political cooperation but crediting Sunni sheiks – not U.S. military muscle – for quelling violence in Anbar Province.
The News reported Sunday that insurgent attacks have fallen to the fewest since March 2004.
Obama’s campaign posted a new Iraq plan Sunday night, which cites an “improved security situation” paid for with the blood of U.S. troops since the surge began in February 2007.
It praises G.I.s’ “hard work, improved counterinsurgency tactics and enormous sacrifice.”
Campaign aide Wendy Morigi said Obama is “not softening his criticism of the surge. We regularly update the Web site to reflect changes in current events.”
GOP rival John McCain zinged Obama as a flip-flopper. “The major point here is that Sen. Obama refuses to acknowledge that he was wrong,” said McCain, adding that Obama “refuses to acknowledge that it [the surge] is succeeding.”
B. Hussein Obama, Website Editor in chief. I love it! 😆 😛 😀 😉
However, the left would just say, what about all the times that the George W. Bush Administration changed their message, as the Iraq dissolved into chaos in 2004? How many times did they change their reasoning for even being there?
Of course, the Republican Neo-Cons are wetting themselves over this, and I’ll put the various ones in down at the end.
The way I see it, he’s coming towards the center, instead of pandering to the hard left, which is what he did in the primary, which is what the Congress did in the 2006 election. I’m personally glad to see that he’s trying to prove himself not to be another Dennis Kucinich, but rather a more moderate progressive, who is more pragmatic, than idealistic. This could very well help him in the general election. I think.
Others, Including right wing Neo-Con’s wetting themselves! 😉 : www.redstate.com, The Swamp, Outside The Beltway, TownHall Blog, The Other McCain, Don Surber, Right Wing Nut House, Atlas Shrugs, Riehl World View, New York Post, MSNBC, Power Line, NO QUARTER, The News Buckit and American Power, Gateway Pundit and more via Memeorandum
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Bush, Cheney, Conservative, Democrat, Democrats, Election ’08, Election 2008, Iraq, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, Neo-Conservatives, News, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Republican, Republicans, Support Our Troops, Terrorism, War, War on Terrorism, Washington DC, White House, constitution party
