Category: Republicans
An Interesting Movie
I post this because I believe that it is interesting. Alex Jones has always struck me as a kook. Someone amongst the “Tin Foil Hat” crowd. However, it is something interesting to watch.
Enjoy…
What do you think? Do you think that there is any truth to this?
Bristol Palin Continued
You know, I have to laugh at these Neo-Conservative Apologists over at NRO’s “The Corner”, who want to gloss over the moral failing of the daughter of the worst Vice-President pick that the Republican Party ever made.
Some lady named Lisa Schiffren over there writes:
For all of the high-minded discussion of marriage policy on these pages and elsewhere, to me it looks very late. That train left a while ago. Even Corner readers, who will discuss choosing life vs. abortion, with endless passion, do not get so worked up about marriage. Which is why all I have to say is, “poor girl.”
Uh, Lisa? How about saying something along the lines of this; So much for those so-called moral values that Bristol’s Mom supposedly promotes, not to mention that entire party. How ironic that the Republican Party, the party that almost breaks it’s back to promote morality, almost to the point of attempting to legislate it; picks a woman, who’s daughter cannot even keep herself until marriage!
Does anyone else, besides me, see the irony here? 😮
From the “Who gives two shits?!?!?” stack: Bristol Palin breaks it off with Levi Johnston
Oh Brother, If I want traffic, I have to report this stuff, here goes……
Via People.com:
Bristol Palin and her fiancé Levi Johnston have broken up, two sources tell PEOPLE.
The split happened "a few weeks ago," according to a source close to the couple, but it’s unclear what precipitated it. "It was a mutual thing," adds the source.
Bristol, the 18-year-old daughter of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, spoke with FOX News in February and told Greta Van Susteren that she and Levi – who are parents to 2-month-old son, Tripp – expected to get married after they completed high school.
"It kind of just happened," says the source, referring to the split. "I thought they would stick it out. But I think they can work together to raise Tripp."
"I’m not sure what caused [them to break up] – it’s common knowledge," says another source who knows the family.
Despite the breakup, Levi still sees the couple’s son. Levi’s dad, Keith Johnston, told PEOPLE recently that his son is a devoted and "proud father."
Normally, I wouldn’t give two shits about stuff like this, but this right here bothered me:
Mercede told Star: "Bristol’s just crazy. That’s the nicest way I can put it. She and Levi actually broke up a while ago!"
Apparently, Levi is also far from being a hands-on dad. Said Mercede: "Levi tries to visit Tripp every single day, but Bristol makes it nearly impossible for him. She tells him he can’t take the baby to our house because she doesn’t want him around ‘white trash.’ She treats him so badly!"
Hmmmph, Bristol did not think that when she had her fucking legs in the air and was letting Levi ream her 17 year old vagina out.
Typical rich white bitch…
Turns out Levi was nothing more than a fucking sperm donor. So, much for family values. This will be good fodder for anyone who wants to run against Sarah Palin, if she runs in 2012, which at this point, would be extremely stupid.
…and to think, we almost put that Alaskan freak show in the White House. ![]()
Others: The Reaction, Pam’s House Blend, DownWithTyranny!, The Other McCain, protein wisdom, Anchorage Daily News, The Impolitic, Liberal Values, Conservatives4Palin.com, Debbie Schlussel,Anne Schroeder’s Blog, Alan Colmes’ Liberaland
Powerful Video
Via D=S:
On Douthat
Yes, I’ve heard about it. I really do not have anything negative to say about him going to the NYT. Douthat on the other hand, I found to be a bit snobbish. I once sent him an e-mail and never got a response. I suppose that Mr. Douthat, a beltway type; has no time for us amateur basement dwellers. Which is pretty fucking ironic, because that is how this whole blogging thing got started, by a bunch of basement dwellers who decided to start writing about politics; Liberal, Conservative, and yes even Libertarian…. and decided to make our own damned community.
I agree with the fact that Douthat will most likely will do better than David Brooks, and believe that is not saying much at all. Brooks was about a fucking idiot. He was a perfect example of the idiotic mumbling that comes out of the Neo-Conservative circles anymore. Which is why the Harlem globetrotter is in the White House now.
Anyhow, I hope he does well and gets his facts straight, because God-knows the Republican Party needs a image makeover right now.
Others; on the right and left: Balloon Juice, The Moderate Voice, The Daily Dish, Blog P.I., Conservatives4Palin.com, pandagon.net, The New Republic, Crunchy Con, The Reaction, MoJo Blog Posts, Outside The Beltway, Liberal Values, Whiskey Fire, AmSpecBlog, Hugh Hewitt’s TownHall Blog, Majikthise, Donklephant and Matthew Yglesias
(Via Memeorandum)
An Interesting Video
Okay, I’d like some feedback on this video here. (H/T to this guy)
Not sure what to think…. Opinions Please.
The only part I really disagreed with is, the part about a Republican style of Government. I do not believe that it was referring to the modern day Republican Party, But rather was referring to a Republic style of Government and not the actual party itself. This would be in contrast to British Monarchy or a, dare I say it? A Socialist Democracy. 😀
Again, feedback, Please, comment!
(Via Freedoms Phoenix)
The Obligatory Charles Freeman withdrawal from appointment posting
I think that this is a good thing, for a number of reasons.
Charles Freeman, the Obama administration’s choice to head the National Intelligence Council, has withdrawn from consideration after facing strong opposition from Senate Republicans.
Freeman is the latest in a string of Obama administration appointees and nominees to withdraw in the past few weeks.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) told The Hill that Freeman has withdrawn his nomination and that Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair agreed to accept the decision. Blair released a statement late Tuesday announcing Freeman’s decision.
The withdrawal came hours after Freeman agreed to testify before the Senate intelligence panel on Thursday to answer questions raised in recent days. All seven Republicans on the panel had sent a letter to Blair raising concerns about Freeman’s experience and objectivity.
Earlier on Tuesday Feinstein told The HIll she was keeping an open mind on Freeman’s appointment.
“I’ve talked to director Blair about it. Director Blair feels this is not a policy job, that he’s well qualified for what he wants him to do,” Feinstein said. “I feel presidents should have their choice if possible of appointments. I’ve read Mr. Freeman characterized in a number of different of ways. We’d like an opportunity to talk with him and get our own fix on these views. How strongly their held, whether in fact there is bias.”
via TheHill.com – Controversial intelligence pick withdraws.
The reason why I say this, is because of this little quote right here: (H/T HotAir.com)
MR. FREEMAN: On the question of U.S. strikes on targets on Iran or elsewhere, I simply want to register what I think is an obvious point; namely that what 9/11 showed is that if we bomb people, they bomb back.
Ed Morrisey provides that perfect reply to this, that I agree with 100%:
Uh, what? Starting in 1993, al-Qaeda conducted a series of attacks on American targets, including the World Trade Center, Khobar Towers, two American embassies in Africa, and the USS Cole. We didn’t attempt to bomb them until 1998, when we missed them entirely, thanks to a collapse in operational security. We didn’t bomb the Saudis or Yemenis at any point, the two nationalities to which Osama bin Laden can lay claim, or Egypt, where Ayman al-Zawahiri was born.
The point is here that this guy was obviously among the anti-Zionist crowd, like these guys here.
Let me be absolutely clear, I am not a huge fan of the Evangelical Zionist crowd; whom are famous for thier doctrinal error and unholy alliances with unbelievers and unsaved, but to have someone who obviously was trying to blame Israel and America for the 9/11 attacks, was not very smart move by the Obama Administration.
So, in this case, yeah, I believe this was a good thing for this clown to remove his name for consideration. Maybe he will get a job with the American Free Press crowd, God knows, that is where he belongs. 🙄
….and before any Conspiracy theory meatballs come in here and try and chide me, feel free, with a push of one button, I can ban your stinking IP address and you won’t even be able to view this blog. So, bring it on boys, I wanna weed out the idiots. 😡
Others: Weekly Standard, Ben Smith’s Blogs, Michelle Malkin, War in Context, The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room, Wall Street Journal, Newshoggers.com, The Strata-Sphere
(Via Memeorandum)
Why I totally reject the so-called "Warning" from David Wilkerson
I noticed here as of lately that on WorldNetDaily, that David Wilkerson has issued a so-called “Warning” and advice to Christians everywhere about some so-called horrific event that is going to take place.
I want it to be known publicly, that I feel that David Wilkerson has had nothing more than an overactive imagination. Which is about all Pentecostals ever have.
I say this, because David Wilkerson is nothing more than a Pentecostal Christian, he is one of the many deluded Christians that possess the flawed belief system, that God is still speaking today, that healing was promised in the atonement, that “Speaking in tongues” is a legit belief system; despite that the fact that the Bible proves that very wrong.
In the interest of full disclosure, I am a former Pentecostal, who came out of that silly bunch of nonsense, after 21 years, of watching that movement steadily veer towards liberal Christianity. I am now a Fundamentalist Christian, my doctrine is of the Baptist nature.
There are a bunch of articles that bring out the nonsensical beliefs that Pentecostals Teach, I highly recommend them to read:
- STRANGE EARLY HISTORY OF PENTECOSTALISM – read this one first!
- BEWARE OF ALLEGED TRIPS TO HEAVEN
- BEWARE OF ALLEGED VISIONS OF JESUS
- BEWARE OF THE DOCTRINE THAT MIRACLES PRODUCE FAITH
- BEWARE OF SPIRITUAL DRUNKENNESS
- BEWARE OF SPIRIT SLAYING
- HOLINESS: THE FALSE AND THE TRUE
- I BELIEVE IN MIRACLES
- PENTECOSTAL-CHARISMATIC TONGUES vs. the BIBLE
- PENTECOSTALISM, EXPERIENCE AND SCRIPTURE
- A PRIVATE PRAYER LANGUAGE?
- WHY ARE PEOPLE DELUDED BY CHARISMATIC ERROR?
More stuff to read about these sort of Christians and their evangelical counterparts:
- THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES
- BEWARE OF BLUE LIKE JAZZ
- BEWARE OF VELVET ELVIS
- IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE SAVED THROUGH CHRIST WITHOUT BELIEVING IN CHRIST?
- ROBERT WEBBER
- THE EMERGENT CHURCH: A MAGNET FOR REBELS
- THE EMERGING CHURCH IS COMING
- THE INCARNATIONAL DOCTRINE
- A VISIT TO THE VINEYARD CHURCH, ANAHEIM, CA
- THE ALPHA COURSE/EVANGELICAL BIBLE STUDIES
- BASKIN-ROBBINS CHRISTIANITY
- BEWARE OF BRENNAN MANNING
- BEWARE OF TONY CAMPOLO
- BILLY GRAHAM’S SAD DISOBEDIENCE TO THE WORD OF GOD
- BREAKING DOWN DENOMINATIONAL BARRIERS
- C.S. LEWIS
- DANGERS ON CHRISTIAN RADIO
- DANGERS IN CHRISTIAN BOOKSTORES
- EVANGELICALS AND MODERNIST ROBERT SCHULLER
- EVANGELICALS AND MORMONS TOGETHER
- JOHN WIMBER AND THE VINEYARD
- GRAHAM WAS WARNED MANY TIMES
- NEW EVANGELICALISM: ITS HISTORY, CHARACTERISTICS AND FRUIT
- THE DENOMINATIONS TODAY
- WHEN DID GRAHAM’S COMPROMISE BEGIN?
- TAKING THE FIRE OUT OF HELL
Hope this helps, Remember everything that the God himself has said and everything that Jesus has ever said, is contained in those 66 book, of that thing we call the Bible. Everything else is a well funded and orchestrated FRAUD!
By the way, I am a King James Bible believer, here are some articles that back up, what I believe:
- APOSTASY AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM
- ARE THE MODERN VERSIONS BASED ON WESTCOTT-HORT?
- A.T. ROBERTSON: EVANGELICAL POPULARIZER OF MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM
- THE BIBLE’S PROOF
- BIBLICAL INSPIRATION
- BIBLICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS ON THE BIBLE VERSION ISSUE
- DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCY: ITS INFLUENCE AND ERROR
- DIFFERENCES IN KJV AND WESTCOTT-HORT
- IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF THE BIBLE TRANSLATORS
- KING JAMES ONLY
- IS THE BIBLE VERSION ISSUE WORTH FIGHTING OVER?
- IS THE KING JAMES BIBLE TOO ANTIQUATED AND DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND?
- IS THE RECEIVED TEXT BASED ON A FEW LATE MANUSCRIPTS?
- MEN OF GOD WHO FORESAW THE FRUIT OF THE MODERN TEXTS AND VERSIONS
- MY POSITION ON THE KING JAMES BIBLE
- STRAINING AT GNATS
- THE MODERN TEXTS AND VERSIONS HAVE PRODUCED THE FRUIT OF THEOLOGICAL MODERNISM
- THE TESTIMONY OF DR. EDWARD F. HILLS
- THE UNITED BIBLE SOCIETIES AND ROME
- THE UNGODLY FRUIT OF MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM
- TEXTUAL CRITICISM IS DRAWN FROM THE WELLS OF INFIDELITY
- WHAT ABOUT ERASMUS?
- WHAT ABOUT PETER RUCKMAN?
- UNREGENERACY AND THE BIBLE SOCIETIES
- UNITARIANISM AND THE MODERN VERSIONS
- WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS AND ROME
Some books to read about the false doctrine of Pentecostalism:
The "so-called' Collapse of Evangelical Christianity.
I have my doubts about this:
We are on the verge – within 10 years – of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity. This breakdown will follow the deterioration of the mainline Protestant world and it will fundamentally alter the religious and cultural environment in the West.
Within two generations, evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its occupants. (Between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelicals.) In the “Protestant” 20th century, Evangelicals flourished. But they will soon be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century.
This collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become hostile toward evangelical Christianity, seeing it as the opponent of the common good.
Millions of Evangelicals will quit. Thousands of ministries will end. Christian media will be reduced, if not eliminated. Many Christian schools will go into rapid decline. I’m convinced the grace and mission of God will reach to the ends of the earth. But the end of evangelicalism as we know it is close.
All this written by a news service which was started by a group of kooks, calling themselves “Christians”. Christian Science is a cult, Started by Mary Baker Eddy. It has been discarded by mainline Christianity for years.
So, in the opinion of this Fundamental Baptist. Take this with a gain of salt.
Others: Crunchy Con, Outside The Beltway, Macsmind, The Other McCain